Agronomic Comparisons of Conventional and Organic Maize during the Transition to an Organic Cropping System

被引:6
作者
Cox, William J. [1 ]
Cherney, Jerome H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrated Plant Sci, Unit Soil & Crop Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2018年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
organic cropping system; maize; maize densities; weed densities; grain N%; yield components; GRAIN PRODUCTION; CORN GROWTH; YIELD; PERFORMANCE; ROTATIONS; WHEAT;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy8070113
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maize producers transitioning to an organic cropping system must grow crops organically without price premiums for 36 months before certification. We evaluated conventional and organic maize with recommended and high seeding and N rates in New York to identify the best organic management practices during the transition. Conventional versus organic maize management differences included a treated (fungicide/insecticide) Genetically Modified (GM) hybrid versus a non-treated non-GM isoline; side-dressed synthetic N versus pre-plow composted manure; and Glyphosate versus mechanical weed control, respectively. Organic versus conventional maize yielded 32% lower as the entry crop (no previous green manure crop). Grain N% and weed densities explained 72% of yield variability. Organic and conventional maize, following wheat/red clover in the second year, yielded similarly. Organic maize with high inputs following wheat/red clover and conventional maize with high inputs following soybean in the third year yielded the highest. Grain N% and maize densities explained 54% of yield variability. Grain crop producers in the Northeast USA who do not have on-farm manure and forage equipment should plant maize after wheat/red clover with additional N (similar to 56 kg N/ha) at higher seeding rates (similar to 7%) during the transition to insure adequate N status and to offset maize density reductions from mechanical weed control.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Archer D.W., 2006, P AM AGR EC ASS ANN
  • [2] Crop productivity and economics during the transition to alternative cropping systems
    Archer, David W.
    Jaradat, Abdullah A.
    Johnson, Jane M-F.
    Weyers, Sharon Lachnicht
    Gesch, Russ W.
    Forcella, Frank
    Kludze, Hillarius K.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (06) : 1538 - 1547
  • [3] Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends
    Baldock, Jon O.
    Hedtcke, Janet L.
    Posner, Joshua L.
    Hall, John A.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (04) : 1509 - 1522
  • [4] Maize Morphophysiological Responses to Intense Crowding and Low Nitrogen Availability: An Analysis and Review
    Boomsma, Christopher R.
    Santini, Judith B.
    Tollenaar, Matthijs
    Vyn, Tony J.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (06) : 1426 - 1452
  • [5] Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean:: a quantitative reappraisal
    Borrás, L
    Slafer, GA
    Otegui, ME
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 86 (2-3) : 131 - 146
  • [6] Long-term agronomic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region
    Cavigelli, Michel A.
    Teasdale, John R.
    Conklin, Anne E.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (03) : 785 - 794
  • [7] Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: II. Economic and Risk Analysis 1993-2006
    Chavas, Jean-Paul
    Posner, Joshua L.
    Hedtcke, Janet L.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (02) : 288 - 295
  • [8] A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages
    Ciampitti, Ignacio A.
    Vyn, Tony J.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 121 (01) : 2 - 18
  • [9] The significance of petroleum bitumen in ancient Egyptian mummies
    Clark, K. A.
    Ikram, S.
    Evershed, R. P.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2016, 374 (2079):
  • [10] Coulter J.A., 2013, Crop Manage, DOI DOI 10.1094/CM-2013-0429-03-RS