Optimal timing of pulse onset for language mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:77
作者
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ]
Tarapore, Phiroz E. [2 ]
Picht, Thomas [3 ]
Tanigawa, Noriko [4 ]
Houde, John [5 ]
Sollmann, Nico [1 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
Vajkoczy, Peter [3 ]
Berger, Mitchel S. [2 ]
Ringel, Florian [1 ]
Nagarajan, Srikantan [5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Neurosurg, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Charite, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Dept Neurosurg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Preoperative mapping; Language; Tumor; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Awake surgery; DIRECT CORTICAL STIMULATION; BRAIN-TUMOR SURGERY; GRADE-II GLIOMAS; WORD PRODUCTION COMPONENTS; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; SPEECH PRODUCTION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; TEMPORAL SIGNATURES; DOMINANT HEMISPHERE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Object: Within the primary motor cortex, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been shown to yield maps strongly correlated with those generated by direct cortical stimulation (DCS). However, the stimulation parameters for repetitive nTMS (rTMS)-based language mapping are still being refined. For this purpose, the present study compares two rTMS protocols, which differ in the timing of pulse train onset relative to picture presentation onset during object naming. Results were the correlated with DCS language mapping during awake surgery. Methods: Thirty-two patients with left-sided perisylvian tumors were examined by rTMS prior to awake surgery. Twenty patients underwent rTMS pulse trains starting at 300 ms after picture presentation onset (DELAYED TMS), whereas another 12 patients received rTMS pulse trains starting at the picture presentation onset (ONSET TMS). These rTMS results were then evaluated for correlation with intraoperative DCS results as gold standard in terms of differential consistencies in receiver operating characteristics (ROC) statistics. Logistic regression analysis by protocols and brain regions were conducted. Results: Within and around Broca's area, there was no difference in sensitivity (ONSET TMS: 100%, DELAYED TMS: 100%), negative predictive value (NPV) (ONSET TMS: 100%, DELAYED TMS: 100%), and positive predictive value (PPV) (ONSET TMS: 55%, DELAYED TMS: 54%) between the two protocols compared to DCS. However, specificity differed significantly (ONSET TMS: 67%, DELAYED TMS: 28%). In contrast, for posterior language regions, such as supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, and posterior superior temporal gyrus, early pulse train onset stimulation showed greater specificity (ONSET TMS: 92%, DELAYED TMS: 20%), NPV (ONSET TMS: 92%, DELAYED TMS: 57%) and PPV (ONSET TMS: 75%, DELAYED TMS: 30%) with comparable sensitivity (ONSET TMS: 75%, DELAYED TMS: 70%). Logistic regression analysis also confirmed the greater fit of the predictions by rTMS that had the pulse train onset coincident with the picture presentation onset when compared to the delayed stimulation. Analyses of differential disruption patterns of mapped cortical regions were further able to distinguish clusters of cortical regions standardly associated with semantic and pre-vocalization phonological networks proposed in various models of word production. Repetitive nTMS predictions by both protocols correlate well with DCS outcomes especially in Broca's region, particularly with regard to TMS negative predictions. Conclusions: With this study, we have demonstrated that rTMS stimulation onset coincident with picture presentation onset improves the accuracy of preoperative language maps, particularly within posterior language areas. Moreover, immediate and delayed pulse train onsets may have complementary disruption patterns that could differentially capture cortical regions causally necessary for semantic and pre-vocalization phonological networks. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 236
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] A Common Neural Substrate for Language Production and Verbal Working Memory
    Acheson, Daniel J.
    Hamidi, Massihullah
    Binder, Jeffrey R.
    Postle, Bradley R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (06) : 1358 - 1367
  • [2] Logistic regression in the medical literature: Standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain
    Bagley, SC
    White, H
    Golomb, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (10) : 979 - 985
  • [3] Multisensory speech perception without the left superior temporal sulcus
    Baum, Sarah H.
    Martin, Randi C.
    Hamilton, A. Cris
    Beauchamp, Michael S.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (03) : 1825 - 1832
  • [4] Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies
    Binder, Jeffrey R.
    Desai, Rutvik H.
    Graves, William W.
    Conant, Lisa L.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (12) : 2767 - 2796
  • [5] Neural Representations and Mechanisms for the Performance of Simple Speech Sequences
    Bohland, Jason W.
    Bullock, Daniel
    Guenther, Frank H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (07) : 1504 - 1529
  • [6] Heteromodal conceptual processing in the angular gyrus
    Bonner, Michael F.
    Peelle, Jonathan E.
    Cook, Philip A.
    Grossman, Murray
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 71 : 175 - 186
  • [7] Reorganization of Functional Connectivity of the Language Network in Patients with Brain Gliomas
    Briganti, C.
    Sestieri, C.
    Mattei, P. A.
    Esposito, R.
    Galzio, R. J.
    Tartaro, A.
    Romani, G. L.
    Caulo, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (10) : 1983 - 1990
  • [8] Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: Implications for models of language representation
    Corina, David P.
    Loudermilk, Brandon C.
    Detwiler, Landon
    Martin, Richard F.
    Brinkley, James F.
    Ojemann, George
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 115 (02) : 101 - 112
  • [9] Dissociation of action and object naming: Evidence from cortical stimulation mapping
    Corina, DP
    Gibson, EK
    Martin, R
    Poliakov, A
    Brinkley, J
    Ojemann, GA
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2005, 24 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [10] Stimulating language: insights from TMS
    Devlin, Joseph T.
    Watkins, Kate E.
    [J]. BRAIN, 2007, 130 : 610 - 622