The Effect of Embodied Impact on the Cost-Optimal Levels of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Case Study of a Residential Building in Thessaloniki, Greece

被引:28
作者
Chastas, Panagiotis [1 ]
Theodosiou, Theodoros [1 ]
Kontoleon, Karolos J. [1 ]
Bikas, Dimitrios [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Civil Engn, Lab Bldg Construct & Bldg Phys, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
embodied impact; CO2; emissions; EPBD recast; nZEB; cost-optimal levels; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; DWELLINGS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/en10060740
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Considering the nearly zero energy building (nZEB) and the increased measures for the improvement of the energy efficiency, the international literature indicates an extended use of specialized materials and technical installations. An increase in the embodied energy follows that use, with a final share between 74% and 100% in the total life cycle energy of residential nZEBs. The current energy efficiency legislation considers only the impact from the operational phase and ignores the embodied impact from the remaining life cycle phases of the building. Nevertheless, the delegated regulation 244 of 2012 acknowledges the incompleteness of this assessment and provides an optional consideration of the embodied (grey) energy. The current study applies this option through the macroeconomic global cost calculations and the cost-optimal levels of nZEBs. The results indicate a limited effect of the embodied impact on the cost-optimal levels and in specific on extended calculation periods and in combination with other key parameters of the sensitivity analysis. An increase in the primary energy and a transposition to variants with lower use of materials and decreased embodied emissions follow this effect. Sensitivity analysis confirms the calculation period as a key parameter and indicates the need for further research.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples [J].
Adalberth, K .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) :321-329
[2]  
Andersen S., 1993, LIVSCYKLUS BASERET B
[3]   Sustainability assessment of dwellings - a comparison of methodologies [J].
Andrade, Joana ;
Braganca, Luis .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 33 (02) :125-146
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 14040 ISO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14025: Environmental labels and declarations
[6]   The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea ;
Di Carlo, Tiziana .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) :869-880
[7]   Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (02) :319-330
[8]  
Bundesministerium fur Umwelt, 2008, NAT CONS BUILD NUCL
[9]   Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study [J].
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Guarino, Francesco ;
Longo, Sonia ;
Mistretta, Marina .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 72 :371-381
[10]   Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations [J].
Chandratilake, S. R. ;
Dias, W. P. S. .
ENERGY, 2013, 59 :22-28