Attitudes and behavior in social space: Public good interventions based on shared representations and environmental influences

被引:52
作者
Liu, JH [1 ]
Sibley, CG [1 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A sub-theory of social space was developed that predicts that attitude-behavior correlations will be reduced in public places when there are either (1) shared representations and behavioral uniformity associated with a group's interaction and social identification with that place, or (2) direct cues from the physical environment that make certain behaviors less likely to be under perceived behavior control. This distinction is critical for knowing when attitudinal or structural interventions are more likely to change different types of behavior in different spaces. The theory was applied to the problem of littering in the central quadrangle (quad) of a university. Study 1 found that attitude-behavior correlations were significantly lower on-Quad compared to off-Quad (for noncigarette littering). Attitude salience manipulations failed to change littering behavior, and there were no differences in social representations of the quad space or attitude-behavior correlations between regular and casual users. Self-monitoring was found to moderate attitude behavior-correlations off-Quad but not on-Quad. In Study 2, a structural intervention (adding ashtrays and litter bins) reduced cigarette littering by 64%, without changing attitudes towards littering. Consistent with the two-stage process model of littering behavior, pro-environmental attitudes predicted active, but not passive, littering. Results supported an environmental perspective in which the structure of the physical environment, rather than group-based social representations and attitudes, moderated the way in which littering behavior was performed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 384
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[2]   Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives [J].
Ajzen, I .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 6 (02) :107-122
[3]  
Ajzen I, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P117
[4]   SELF-MONITORING AND THE ATTITUDE BEHAVIOR RELATION [J].
AJZEN, I ;
TIMKO, C ;
WHITE, JB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (03) :426-435
[5]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[6]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[7]  
Ajzen I., 1985, Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior, P11
[8]  
BAGOZZI RP, 1990, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V20, P45
[9]  
BAIZE HR, 1985, REPRESENTATIVE RES S, V15, P36