Revisiting moment-based characterization for wind pressures

被引:33
作者
Huang, Gnoqing [1 ]
Luo, Ying [1 ]
Gurley, Kurtis R. [2 ]
Ding, Jie [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Civil & Coastal Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wind pressure; Non-Gaussian process; Hermite polynomial model; Skewness; Kurtosis; Peak factor; Peak value; BUILDINGS; DISTRIBUTIONS; SAMPLES; MODELS; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2016.02.006
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The estimation of peak wind pressures is important in the reliability-and performance-based design for low-rise buildings. Typically, Davenport's formula is widely used to determine the peak factor if the pressure approximately follows Gaussian distribution. Recently, the moment-based Hermite polynoMial model (HPM) is becoming popular to estimate the peak factor when the non-Gaussianity of wind pressure exists. However, their performances deserve further study based on the appropriate wind tunnel data. In this study, Davenport's formula and moment-based HPM are reviewed. The peak value of wind pressure is determined using very long time histories of wind pressure data to evaluate the performance of moment-based HPM and Davenport's formula. Results suggest that moment-based HPM should be adopted in the peak value estimation for wind pressures when the skewness and kurtosis of a process are sufficient to capture its non-Gaussian properties. Results also show that Davenport's formula may cause noticeable errors in the peak factor estimation for the wind pressure data close to Gaussian process while HPM provides a robust estimation for these data. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 168
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, DOI DOI 10.1680/IICEP.1964.10112
[2]   Peak factor estimation in hurricane surface winds [J].
Balderrama, J. A. ;
Masters, F. J. ;
Gurley, K. R. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2012, 102 :1-13
[3]   Estimation of Probabilistic Extreme Wind Load Effects: Combination of Aerodynamic and Wind Climate Data [J].
Chen, Xinzhong ;
Huang, Guoqing .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2010, 136 (06) :747-760
[4]   Evaluation of peak resultant response for wind-excited tall buildings [J].
Chen, Xinzhong ;
Huang, Guoqing .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (04) :858-868
[5]   The Hermite Moment Model for Highly Skewed Response With Application to Tension Leg Platforms [J].
Choi, Myoungkeun ;
Sweetman, Bert .
JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 132 (02) :1-8
[6]  
Cook N.J., 1990, The Designer's Guide to Wind Loading of Building Structures-Part2: Static Structures
[7]   Assessment of methods for extreme value analysis of non-Gaussian wind effects with short-term time history samples [J].
Ding, Jie ;
Chen, Xinzhong .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 80 :75-88
[8]   Integration of non-Gaussian fields [J].
Ditlevsen, O ;
Mohr, G ;
Hoffmeyer, P .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1996, 11 (01) :15-23
[9]   CROSSINGS OF NON-GAUSSIAN TRANSLATION PROCESSES [J].
GRIGORIU, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1984, 110 (04) :610-620
[10]  
Gurley K.R., 1997, Modelling and Simulation of Non-Gaussian Processes