Consumer preferences for fair labour certification

被引:29
作者
Drichoutis, Andreas C. [1 ]
Vassilopoulos, Achilleas [1 ,2 ]
Lusk, Jayson L. [3 ]
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Athens, Greece
[2] ICRE8 Int Ctr Res Environm & Econ, Athens, Greece
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[5] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res, Oslo, Norway
[6] Korea Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
fair labour label; willingness-to-pay; equivalent loss; contingent valuation; inferred valuation; consequentiality; cheap talk; uncertainty scale; C83; C93; D12; Q13; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; FIELD; MIGRANTS; VALIDITY; MECHANISMS; PROVISION; BENEFITS; CHOICE; GREECE;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jbx002
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
High-profile cases of exploitative labour practices have increased concerns over agricultural working conditions. However, it is unclear to what extent the public is willing to trade-off fair working conditions for higher prices. We implement a large-scale survey in Greece to uncover consumer preferences for a food labelling system that certifies fair working conditions for the workers employed in agricultural production. With our most conservative estimates, we find that consumers are willing to pay an average premium of 53 cents of a Euro per 500 g, 95 per cent CI [43.9, 62.3], for strawberries with fair labour certification. This result suggests that consumers do value the better treatment of workers in the agricultural sector. It also suggests that there is a current market failure, created by the asymmetry of information between consumers and producers, that can be the basis of discussion for alternative labelling schemes involving fair labour labels. We also tested a number of known biases associated with consumer behaviour or the contingent valuation method and found the positive willingness-to-pay result to be robust.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 474
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Carroll C., 2012, ARE Update, VVolume 15, P12
[12]   Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren't Available [J].
Carson, Richard T. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (04) :27-42
[13]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[14]   Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design [J].
Charness, Gary ;
Gneezy, Uri ;
Kuhn, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) :1-8
[15]   Ambiguity of measured WTP for quality improvements when quantity is unconstrained: a note [J].
Corsi, Alessandro .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 34 (04) :501-515
[16]   The Economics of Fair Trade [J].
Dragusanu, Raluca ;
Giovannucci, Daniele ;
Nunn, Nathan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (03) :217-236
[17]   Elicitation formats and the WTA/WTP gap: A study of climate neutral foods [J].
Drichoutis, Andreas C. ;
Lusk, Jayson L. ;
Pappa, Valentina .
FOOD POLICY, 2016, 61 :141-155
[18]   Political affiliation and willingness to pay: An examination of the nature of benefits and means of provision [J].
Dupont, Diane P. ;
Bateman, Ian J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 75 :43-51
[19]   A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs [J].
Ethier, RG ;
Poe, GL ;
Schulze, WD ;
Clark, J .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2000, 76 (01) :54-67
[20]  
Eurostat, 2016, POP 1 JAN 5 YEAR AG