Consumer preferences for fair labour certification

被引:29
作者
Drichoutis, Andreas C. [1 ]
Vassilopoulos, Achilleas [1 ,2 ]
Lusk, Jayson L. [3 ]
Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Athens, Athens, Greece
[2] ICRE8 Int Ctr Res Environm & Econ, Athens, Greece
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[5] Norwegian Inst Bioecon Res, Oslo, Norway
[6] Korea Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
fair labour label; willingness-to-pay; equivalent loss; contingent valuation; inferred valuation; consequentiality; cheap talk; uncertainty scale; C83; C93; D12; Q13; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; FIELD; MIGRANTS; VALIDITY; MECHANISMS; PROVISION; BENEFITS; CHOICE; GREECE;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jbx002
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
High-profile cases of exploitative labour practices have increased concerns over agricultural working conditions. However, it is unclear to what extent the public is willing to trade-off fair working conditions for higher prices. We implement a large-scale survey in Greece to uncover consumer preferences for a food labelling system that certifies fair working conditions for the workers employed in agricultural production. With our most conservative estimates, we find that consumers are willing to pay an average premium of 53 cents of a Euro per 500 g, 95 per cent CI [43.9, 62.3], for strawberries with fair labour certification. This result suggests that consumers do value the better treatment of workers in the agricultural sector. It also suggests that there is a current market failure, created by the asymmetry of information between consumers and producers, that can be the basis of discussion for alternative labelling schemes involving fair labour labels. We also tested a number of known biases associated with consumer behaviour or the contingent valuation method and found the positive willingness-to-pay result to be robust.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 474
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, STAT 12 BAS REF MAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 22595 NBER PRINC U
[4]   Consistently inconsistent: The role of certainty, acceptability and scale in choice [J].
Beck, Matthew J. ;
Rose, John M. ;
Hensher, David A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 56 :81-93
[5]   Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment [J].
Blumenschein, K ;
Johannesson, M ;
Yokoyama, KK ;
Freeman, PR .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (03) :441-457
[6]   Do E-Verify Mandates Improve Labor Market Outcomes of Low-Skilled Native and Legal Immigrant Workers? [J].
Bohn, Sarah ;
Lofstrom, Magnus ;
Raphael, Steven .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 81 (04) :960-979
[7]   The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study [J].
Bulte, E ;
Gerking, S ;
List, JA ;
de Zeeuw, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 49 (02) :330-342
[8]  
Buzby J. C., 1998, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V30, P69
[10]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR CLOSED-ENDED CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
JAMES, MD .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (02) :269-276