Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment

被引:17
作者
Lherrnie, Guillaume [1 ]
Wernli, Didier [2 ,3 ]
Jorgensen, Peter Sogaard [4 ,5 ]
Kenkel, Donald [6 ]
Lawell, C. -Y. Cynthia Lin [7 ,8 ]
Tauer, Loren William [7 ,8 ]
Grohn, Yrjo Tapio [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Populat Med & Diagnost Sci, Coll Vet Med, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Univ Geneva, Global Studies Inst, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Publ Hlth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Global Econ Dynam & Biosphere, Box 50005, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Cornell Univ, Dept Policy Anal & Management, Coll Human Ecol, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] Cornell Univ, Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Management, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Ithaca, NY USA
[8] Cornell Univ, SC Johnson Coll Business, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
Antimicrobial use; Antimicrobial resistance; Agriculture; Sustainability assessment; Social-ecological system; Indicators; DYNAMIC EFFICIENCY COSTS; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; DPSIR FRAMEWORK; CONSUMPTION; PROGRESS; ANIMALS; POLICY; MODEL; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106427
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal agriculture contributes to select resistant bacteria potentially transferred to humans directly or indirectly via the food chain, representing a public health hazard. Yet, a major difference triggering AMU in food animal production is that in addition to therapeutic cure, farmers use antimicrobials to keep their herds healthy and highly productive, while ensuring animal welfare and food safety objectives. As a society, we consequently face difficult tradeoffs, between massive restrictions of AMU, and maintenance of current and potentially non-sustainable consumption levels. Here, we present the different components to be addressed for assessing the sustainability of AMU in animal agriculture. At first, we describe the interests and limits of existing models identified by reviewing the literature, which could potentially be used to assess AMU sustainability, while allowing the reader to capture in a simple and visual manner the complexity of the issue. We address in the following sections the boundaries of the social-ecological system and the indicators that are required for assessment of AMU sustainability. We introduce analytic methods that could be used for assessing the sustainability of antimicrobial use.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Ali M, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT: CONTEXT OF RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-407196-4.00001-5
[2]  
American Association of Bovine Practitioners, 2017, KEY ELEMENTS FOR IMP
[3]  
American Association of Bovine Practitioners, 2013, PRUDENT ANTIMICROBIA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Signals and boundaries: Building blocks for complex adaptive systems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, WORLD DEV REPORT 198, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07488008808408783, 10.1080/07488008808408783]
[6]  
[Anonymous], INFECT CONTROL HOSP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment, P1
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RABIES
[9]  
Anses, 2018, RAPPORT ANNUEL MEDIC
[10]  
Auffhammer M., 2016, Bending the Curve: Ten scalable solutions for carbon neutrality and climate stability, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1525/C0LLABRA.63