Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Is Superior to CT as First-Line Diagnostic Imaging in Patients Referred with Serious Nonspecific Symptoms or Signs of Cancer: A Randomized Prospective Study of 200 Patients

被引:27
作者
Lebech, Anne-Mette [1 ]
Gaardsting, Anne [1 ]
Loft, Annika [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Graff, Jesper [5 ]
Markova, Elena [6 ]
Bertelsen, Anne Kiil [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Madsen, Jan Lysgard [5 ]
Andersen, Kim Francis [2 ,3 ,4 ]
von Benzon, Eric [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Helms, Morten [1 ]
Mathiesen, Lars R. [1 ]
David, Kim P. [1 ]
Kronborg, Gitte [1 ]
Kjaer, Andreas [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Cluster Mol Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, Hvidovre, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; molecular imaging; cancer; prospective study; randomized study; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; INTERVAL; PATHWAY; COMMON;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.116.175380
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A fast-track pathway has been established in Denmark to investigate patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC), who are not eligible to enter an organ-specific cancer program. The prevalence of cancer in this cohort is approximately 20%. The optimal screening strategy in patients with NSSC remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate whether F-18-FDG PET/CT was superior to CT as an initial imaging modality in patients with NSSC. In a randomized prospective trial, the imaging modalities were compared with regard to diagnostic performance. Methods: Two hundred patients were randomized 1: 1 to whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT or CT of the thorax and abdomen as the imaging modality. A tentative diagnosis was established after first-line imaging. The final referral diagnosis was adjudicated by the physician, when sufficient data were available. Results: One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for analysis because 3 patients withdrew consent before scanning. Thirty-nine (20%) patients were diagnosed with cancer, 10 (5%) with an infection, 15 (8%) with an autoimmune disease, and 76 (39%) with other diseases. In the remaining 57 patients (28%), no specific disease was found. F-18-FDG PET/CT had a higher specificity (96% vs. 85%; P = 0.028) and a higher accuracy (94% vs. 82%; P = 0.017) than CT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (83% vs. 70%) or negative predictive values (96% vs. 92%). No difference in days to final referral diagnosis according to randomization group could be shown (7.2 vs. 7.6 d). However, for the subgroups in which the imaging modality showed a suggestion of malignancy, there was a significant delay to final diagnosis in the CT group compared with the F-18-FDG PET/CT group (11.6 vs. 5.7 d; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Compared with CT, we found a higher diagnostic specificity and accuracy of F-18-FDG PET/CT for detecting cancer in patients with NSSC. F-18-FDG PET/CT should therefore be considered as first-line imaging in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1064
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) [J].
Allemani, Claudia ;
Weir, Hannah K. ;
Carreira, Helena ;
Harewood, Rhea ;
Spika, Devon ;
Wang, Xiao-Si ;
Bannon, Finian ;
Ahn, Jane V. ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Bonaventure, Audrey ;
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael ;
Stiller, Charles ;
Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J. ;
Rachet, Bernard ;
Soeberg, Matthew J. ;
You, Hui ;
Matsuda, Tomohiro ;
Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena ;
Storm, Hans ;
Tucker, Thomas C. ;
Coleman, Michel P. .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9972) :977-1010
[2]  
Bar-Shalom R, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1200
[3]  
Bislev LS, 2015, DAN MED J, V62
[4]  
Chen YK, 2004, ANTICANCER RES, V24, P4103
[5]  
Cohade C, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1797
[6]   Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data [J].
Coleman, M. P. ;
Forman, D. ;
Bryant, H. ;
Butler, J. ;
Rachet, B. ;
Maringe, C. ;
Nur, U. ;
Tracey, E. ;
Coory, M. ;
Hatcher, J. ;
McGahan, C. E. ;
Turner, D. ;
Marrett, L. ;
Gjerstorff, M. L. ;
Johannesen, T. B. ;
Adolfsson, J. ;
Lambe, M. ;
Lawrence, G. ;
Meechan, D. ;
Morris, E. J. ;
Middleton, R. ;
Steward, J. ;
Richards, M. A. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9760) :127-138
[7]   Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study [J].
De Angelis, Roberta ;
Sant, Milena ;
Coleman, Michel P. ;
Francisci, Silvia ;
Baili, Paolo ;
Pierannunzio, Daniela ;
Trama, Annalisa ;
Visser, Otto ;
Brenner, Hermann ;
Ardanaz, Eva ;
Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena ;
Engholm, Gerda ;
Nennecke, Alice ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
Berrino, Franco ;
Capocaccia, Riccardo .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (01) :23-34
[8]   PET/CT Imaging in Cancer: Current Applications and Future Directions [J].
Farwell, Michael D. ;
Pryma, Daniel A. ;
Mankoff, David A. .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (22) :3433-3445
[9]  
Fredberg Ulrich, 2011, Ugeskr Laeger, V173, P1718
[10]  
Ide M, 2006, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V50, P23