Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Is Superior to CT as First-Line Diagnostic Imaging in Patients Referred with Serious Nonspecific Symptoms or Signs of Cancer: A Randomized Prospective Study of 200 Patients

被引:27
作者
Lebech, Anne-Mette [1 ]
Gaardsting, Anne [1 ]
Loft, Annika [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Graff, Jesper [5 ]
Markova, Elena [6 ]
Bertelsen, Anne Kiil [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Madsen, Jan Lysgard [5 ]
Andersen, Kim Francis [2 ,3 ,4 ]
von Benzon, Eric [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Helms, Morten [1 ]
Mathiesen, Lars R. [1 ]
David, Kim P. [1 ]
Kronborg, Gitte [1 ]
Kjaer, Andreas [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Cluster Mol Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, Hvidovre, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; molecular imaging; cancer; prospective study; randomized study; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; INTERVAL; PATHWAY; COMMON;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.116.175380
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A fast-track pathway has been established in Denmark to investigate patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC), who are not eligible to enter an organ-specific cancer program. The prevalence of cancer in this cohort is approximately 20%. The optimal screening strategy in patients with NSSC remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate whether F-18-FDG PET/CT was superior to CT as an initial imaging modality in patients with NSSC. In a randomized prospective trial, the imaging modalities were compared with regard to diagnostic performance. Methods: Two hundred patients were randomized 1: 1 to whole-body F-18-FDG PET/CT or CT of the thorax and abdomen as the imaging modality. A tentative diagnosis was established after first-line imaging. The final referral diagnosis was adjudicated by the physician, when sufficient data were available. Results: One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for analysis because 3 patients withdrew consent before scanning. Thirty-nine (20%) patients were diagnosed with cancer, 10 (5%) with an infection, 15 (8%) with an autoimmune disease, and 76 (39%) with other diseases. In the remaining 57 patients (28%), no specific disease was found. F-18-FDG PET/CT had a higher specificity (96% vs. 85%; P = 0.028) and a higher accuracy (94% vs. 82%; P = 0.017) than CT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (83% vs. 70%) or negative predictive values (96% vs. 92%). No difference in days to final referral diagnosis according to randomization group could be shown (7.2 vs. 7.6 d). However, for the subgroups in which the imaging modality showed a suggestion of malignancy, there was a significant delay to final diagnosis in the CT group compared with the F-18-FDG PET/CT group (11.6 vs. 5.7 d; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Compared with CT, we found a higher diagnostic specificity and accuracy of F-18-FDG PET/CT for detecting cancer in patients with NSSC. F-18-FDG PET/CT should therefore be considered as first-line imaging in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1064
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)
    Allemani, Claudia
    Weir, Hannah K.
    Carreira, Helena
    Harewood, Rhea
    Spika, Devon
    Wang, Xiao-Si
    Bannon, Finian
    Ahn, Jane V.
    Johnson, Christopher J.
    Bonaventure, Audrey
    Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
    Stiller, Charles
    Azevedo e Silva, Gulnar
    Chen, Wan-Qing
    Ogunbiyi, Olufemi J.
    Rachet, Bernard
    Soeberg, Matthew J.
    You, Hui
    Matsuda, Tomohiro
    Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena
    Storm, Hans
    Tucker, Thomas C.
    Coleman, Michel P.
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9972) : 977 - 1010
  • [2] Bar-Shalom R, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1200
  • [3] Bislev LS, 2015, DAN MED J, V62
  • [4] Chen YK, 2004, ANTICANCER RES, V24, P4103
  • [5] Cohade C, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1797
  • [6] Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data
    Coleman, M. P.
    Forman, D.
    Bryant, H.
    Butler, J.
    Rachet, B.
    Maringe, C.
    Nur, U.
    Tracey, E.
    Coory, M.
    Hatcher, J.
    McGahan, C. E.
    Turner, D.
    Marrett, L.
    Gjerstorff, M. L.
    Johannesen, T. B.
    Adolfsson, J.
    Lambe, M.
    Lawrence, G.
    Meechan, D.
    Morris, E. J.
    Middleton, R.
    Steward, J.
    Richards, M. A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 377 (9760) : 127 - 138
  • [7] Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study
    De Angelis, Roberta
    Sant, Milena
    Coleman, Michel P.
    Francisci, Silvia
    Baili, Paolo
    Pierannunzio, Daniela
    Trama, Annalisa
    Visser, Otto
    Brenner, Hermann
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Bielska-Lasota, Magdalena
    Engholm, Gerda
    Nennecke, Alice
    Siesling, Sabine
    Berrino, Franco
    Capocaccia, Riccardo
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [8] PET/CT Imaging in Cancer: Current Applications and Future Directions
    Farwell, Michael D.
    Pryma, Daniel A.
    Mankoff, David A.
    [J]. CANCER, 2014, 120 (22) : 3433 - 3445
  • [9] Fredberg Ulrich, 2011, Ugeskr Laeger, V173, P1718
  • [10] Ide M, 2006, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V50, P23