Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Mullerian anomalies: a population based study

[11] Zeteroglu S., Ustun Y., Engin-Ustun Y., Sahin H.G., Kamaci M., Eight years' experience of uterine rupture cases, J Obstet Gynaecol, 25, pp. 458-461, (2005)

[12] Stein A.L., March C.M., Pregnancy outcome in women with mullerian duct anomalies, J Reprod Med, 35, pp. 411-414, (1990)

[13] Ravasia D.J., Brain P.H., Pollard J.K., Incidence of uterine rupture among women with mullerian duct anomalies who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 181, pp. 877-881, (1999)

[14] The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions, Fertil Steril, 49, pp. 944-955, (1988)

[15] Gilstrap III L.C., Ramin S., Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 33, January 2002: Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia, Obstet Gynecol, 99, pp. 159-167, (2002)

[16] White P., Pregnancy complicating diabetes, Am J Med, 7, pp. 609-616, (1949)

[17] Leiberman J.R., Fraser D., Weitzman S., Glezerman M., Birthweight curves in southern Israel populations, Isr J Med Sci, 29, pp. 198-203, (1993)

[18] Nahum G.G., Uterine anomalies, induction of labor, and uterine rupture, Obstet Gynecol, 106, pp. 1150-1152, (2005)

[19] Kwee A., Bots M.L., Visser G.H., Bruinse H.W., Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, (2006)

[20] Macones G.A., Peipert J., Nelson D.B., Et al., Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, pp. 1656-1662, (2005)

[11] Zeteroglu S., Ustun Y., Engin-Ustun Y., Sahin H.G., Kamaci M., Eight years' experience of uterine rupture cases, J Obstet Gynaecol, 25, pp. 458-461, (2005)

[12] Stein A.L., March C.M., Pregnancy outcome in women with mullerian duct anomalies, J Reprod Med, 35, pp. 411-414, (1990)

[13] Ravasia D.J., Brain P.H., Pollard J.K., Incidence of uterine rupture among women with mullerian duct anomalies who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 181, pp. 877-881, (1999)

[14] The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions, Fertil Steril, 49, pp. 944-955, (1988)

[15] Gilstrap III L.C., Ramin S., Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 33, January 2002: Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia, Obstet Gynecol, 99, pp. 159-167, (2002)

[16] White P., Pregnancy complicating diabetes, Am J Med, 7, pp. 609-616, (1949)

[17] Leiberman J.R., Fraser D., Weitzman S., Glezerman M., Birthweight curves in southern Israel populations, Isr J Med Sci, 29, pp. 198-203, (1993)

[18] Nahum G.G., Uterine anomalies, induction of labor, and uterine rupture, Obstet Gynecol, 106, pp. 1150-1152, (2005)

[19] Kwee A., Bots M.L., Visser G.H., Bruinse H.W., Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, (2006)

[20] Macones G.A., Peipert J., Nelson D.B., Et al., Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, pp. 1656-1662, (2005)