Tumor location is an independent prognostic factor of esophageal adenocarcinoma based on the eighth edition of TNM staging system in Chinese patients

被引:6
|
作者
Deng, Han-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Xi [2 ]
Alai, Guha [1 ]
Li, Gang [1 ]
Luo, Jun [1 ]
Zhuo, Ze-Guo [1 ]
Li, Yi-Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lung Canc Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Esophagus; adenocarcinoma; tumor location; prognosis; eighth edition of TNM staging system; LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; SINGLE-INSTITUTION; SURVIVAL; CANCER; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.21037/atm.2019.01.84
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Whether tumor location has any impact on the survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumor location for esophageal adenocarcinoma based on the eighth edition of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in Chinese patients for the first time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma in our department. We analyzed the data about demography, comorbidity, pathologic findings, surgical approach, adjuvant therapy, and survival time. Tumor location was categorized into two groups: adenocarcinomas at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and adenocarcinomas at other sites of the esophagus. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were applied. And propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was also conducted for comparison. Results: A total of 107 patients from January 2009 to December 2015 were involved in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 60.0 months and the median survival time of all those patients was 41.0 months. In the univariate analysis, adenocarcinomas in the EGJ (P=0.047), early pT stage (P=0.030), and moderate/well differentiation (P=0.022) were significantly correlated with better survival. Moreover, in the multivariate analysis, tumor site [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.536; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.300-0.958], pT stage (HR = 0.298; 95% CI = 0.124-0.717), and tumor differentiation (HR = 0.437; 95% CI = 0.238-0.802) were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival of these esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. After the adjustment by PSM, patients with adenocarcinomas at the EGJ still yielded significantly longer survival than these with adenocarcinomas at other sites of the esophagus (P=0.039). Conclusions: Tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma based on the eighth edition of TNM staging system in Chinese patients. Therefore, different surgical therapeutic modalities may be applied for esophageal adenocarcinoma with different tumor locations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cribriform Subtype is an Independent Predictor of Recurrence and Survival After Adjustment for the Eighth Edition of TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Kadota, Kyuichi
    Kushida, Yoshio
    Kagawa, Seiko
    Ishikawa, Ryou
    Ibuki, Emi
    Inoue, Kosuke
    Go, Tetsuhiko
    Yokomise, Hiroyasu
    Ishii, Tomoya
    Kadowaki, Norimitsu
    Haba, Reiji
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [2] Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Pu, Ning
    Yin, Lingdi
    Habib, Joseph R.
    Gao, Shanshan
    Hu, Haijie
    Zhu, Yayun
    Wu, Yong
    Yu, Jun
    Lou, Wenhui
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (30) : 3457 - 3465
  • [3] A novel risk classification system based on the eighth edition of TNM frameworks for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients: A deep learning approach
    Shen, Qiang
    Chen, Hongyu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] Application of the Eighth AJCC TNM Staging System in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Hsu, Po-Kuei
    Chen, Hui-Shan
    Liu, Chia-Chuan
    Wu, Shiao-Chi
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (05) : 1516 - 1522
  • [5] Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study
    Yuan, Yonggang
    Ma, Ge
    Hu, Xuelei
    Huang, Qingyuan
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (13): : 4648 - 4655
  • [6] Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new 9th edition Tumor-Node-Metastases (TNM) staging system for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with bone metastases
    Peng, Jin
    Hu, Fang
    Mao, Xiaowei
    Niu, Yanjie
    Ma, Meili
    Jiang, Liyan
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [7] Is the new distribution of early esophageal adenocarcinoma stages improving the prognostic prediction of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for esophageal cancer?
    Mo, Ran
    Chen, Chen
    Pan, Liang
    Yu, Ao
    Wang, Dongjin
    Wang, Tao
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (09) : 5192 - 5198
  • [8] Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an independent adverse prognostic factor in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Aichler, Michaela
    Motschmann, Martin
    Juetting, Uta
    Luber, Birgit
    Becker, Karen
    Ott, Katja
    Lordick, Florian
    Langer, Rupert
    Feith, Marcus
    Siewert, Joerg Ruediger
    Walch, Axel
    ONCOTARGET, 2014, 5 (16) : 6620 - 6632
  • [9] The Role and Prognostic Significance of Aortopulmonary, Anterior Mediastinal, and Tracheobronchial Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Cancer: Update of the Eighth-Edition TNM Staging System (2018)
    Wang, Wen-Ping
    Ni, Peng-Zhi
    Yang, Yu-Shang
    He, Song-Lin
    Hu, Wei-Peng
    Chen, Long-Qi
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 1005 - 1011
  • [10] The prognostic value of tumor deposits and the impact on the TNM classification system in esophageal cancer patients
    Zhang, Guochao
    Zhang, Chaoqi
    Wang, Lide
    Xue, Liyan
    Jia, Jia
    Zuo, Zhichao
    Sun, Nan
    Gao, Shugeng
    Xue, Qi
    He, Jie
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 123 (04) : 891 - 903