Longitudinal change in cerebroplacental ratio in small-for-gestational-age fetuses and risk of stillbirth

被引:13
作者
Kalafat, E. [1 ,2 ]
Ozturk, E. [3 ]
Sivanathan, J. [1 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [1 ,4 ]
Khalil, A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Biostat, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[4] St Georges Univ London, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, Vascular Biol Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
cerebroplacental ratio; longitudinal; perinatal death; small-for-gestational age; stillbirth; FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; MIDDLE CEREBRAL-ARTERY; PULSATILITY INDEX; REFERENCE RANGES; DOPPLER RATIO; FLOW; PREDICTION; DELIVERY; TRIMESTER; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.20193
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether assessment of longitudinal change in Doppler variables in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses improves the prediction of those at risk of stillbirth. Methods This was a longitudinal study of two cohorts of singleton pregnancies, which included SGA and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses, respectively. The inclusion criteria for the SGA cohort were singleton pregnancy at >= 20 weeks' gestation, classified as SGA (estimated fetal weight < 10th centile). The AGA cohort consisted of singleton pregnancies deemed at high risk of being SGA, which were followed up longitudinally but remained AGA. Fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) and umbilical artery (UA)-PI were measured longitudinally and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated, and values were converted to multiples of the median. The last two measurements prior to delivery were included in the analysis. Longitudinal models for Doppler variables were developed using linear-mixed models and their accuracy in the prediction of stillbirth was tested using generalized linear models. A Bayesian framework was employed to compare the accuracy of longitudinal and standard (last-scan measurement) models. Results In total, 1549 AGA and 941 SGA pregnancies were included in the analysis. There were 30 (3.2%) and no stillbirth cases in the SGA and AGA groups, respectively. Change in MCA-PI, UA-PI and CPR with advancing gestation was significantly different between liveborn AGA and SGA fetuses, with a less pronounced difference with advancing gestation. Using the last measurement, the best models for the prediction of stillbirth in SGA pregnancies were those based on CPR (accuracy, 75.0%; 95% CI, 72.6-77.2%) and UA-PI (accuracy, 71.0%; 95% CI, 68.6-73.4%). The posterior probability of the standard CPR model having a higher accuracy compared with the UA-PI model was 97.2% (magnitude of change (MC), 3.9%; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.5-7.3%). The accuracies of the standard, compared with the longitudinal, models for UA-PI (71.0% vs 72.8%), MCA-PI (64.6% vs 63.8%) and CPR (75.0% vs 74.9%) in the prediction of stillbirth were not significantly different. The posterior probabilities for improvement in accuracy using longitudinal, compared with standard, assessment were 50.1% (MC, < 0.1%; 95% CrI,-3.3 to 3.3%), 35.2% (MC,-0.1%; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 2.8%) and 82.2% (MC, 1.9%; 95% CrI,-1.5 to 5.3%) for CPR, MCA-PI and UA-PI models, respectively. Therefore, change in Doppler parameters did not improve the accuracy of the prediction of stillbirth, compared with that of the last-scan measurement. Conclusion Longitudinal assessment of Doppler parameters was not useful in improving the detection of stillbirth in SGA pregnancies, as compared with a single-point assessment. Copyright (C) 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact on obstetric outcome of third-trimester screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Callec, R.
    Lamy, C.
    Perdriolle-Galet, E.
    Patte, C.
    Heude, B.
    Morel, O.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (02) : 216 - 220
  • [32] Perinatal Outcomes of Fetuses with Early Growth Restriction, Late Growth Restriction, Small for Gestational Age, and Adequate for Gestational Age
    Silveira Inacio, Quenya Antunes
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    Machado Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes
    Petrini, Caetano Galvao
    Campos, Victor Paranaiba
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2019, 41 (12): : 688 - 696
  • [33] A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Dammer, Ulf
    Raabe, Eva
    Kehl, Sven
    Schmid, Matthias
    Schild, Ralf L.
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Mayr, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (08) : 1713 - 1724
  • [34] The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus
    Pilliod, Rachel A.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Snowden, Jonathan M.
    Doss, Amy E.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (04) : 318.e1 - 318.e6
  • [35] Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    DiGiulio, Daniel B.
    Gervasi, Maria Teresa
    Romero, Roberto
    Vaisbuch, Edi
    Mazaki-Tovi, Shali
    Kusanovic, Juan Pedro
    Seok, Kimberley S.
    Gomez, Ricardo
    Mittal, Pooja
    Gotsch, Francesca
    Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn
    Oyarzun, Enrique
    Kim, Chong Jai
    Relman, David A.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (05) : 495 - 502
  • [36] Similarity network fusion to identify phenotypes of small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Miranda, Jezid
    Paules, Cristina
    Noell, Guillaume
    Youssef, Lina
    Paternina-Caicedo, Angel
    Crovetto, Francesca
    Canellas, Nicolau
    Garcia-Martin, Maria L.
    Amigo, Nuria
    Eixarch, Elisenda
    Faner, Rosa
    Figueras, Francesc
    Simos, Rui, V
    Crispi, Fatima
    Gratacos, Eduard
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (09)
  • [37] Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate
    Nowacka, U.
    Papastefanou, I
    Bouariu, A.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [38] Small-for-gestational-age babies after 37 weeks: impact study of risk-stratification protocol
    Veglia, M.
    Cavallaro, A.
    Papageorghiou, A.
    Black, R.
    Impey, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [39] Association between Doppler assessment and secondary cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Scholz, Anna S.
    Ronay, Vanessa
    Wallwiener, Markus
    Fluhr, Herbert
    von Au, Alexandra
    Spratte, Julia
    Wallwiener, Stephanie
    Elsaesser, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (02) : 719 - 728
  • [40] Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: external validation of the IRIS algorithm
    Kalafat, Erkan
    Morales-Rosello, Jose
    Scarinci, Elisa
    Thilaganathan, Basky
    Khalil, Asma
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (16) : 2775 - 2784