Longitudinal change in cerebroplacental ratio in small-for-gestational-age fetuses and risk of stillbirth

被引:13
作者
Kalafat, E. [1 ,2 ]
Ozturk, E. [3 ]
Sivanathan, J. [1 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [1 ,4 ]
Khalil, A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, London, England
[2] Middle East Tech Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Biostat, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[4] St Georges Univ London, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, Vascular Biol Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
cerebroplacental ratio; longitudinal; perinatal death; small-for-gestational age; stillbirth; FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; MIDDLE CEREBRAL-ARTERY; PULSATILITY INDEX; REFERENCE RANGES; DOPPLER RATIO; FLOW; PREDICTION; DELIVERY; TRIMESTER; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.20193
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether assessment of longitudinal change in Doppler variables in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses improves the prediction of those at risk of stillbirth. Methods This was a longitudinal study of two cohorts of singleton pregnancies, which included SGA and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses, respectively. The inclusion criteria for the SGA cohort were singleton pregnancy at >= 20 weeks' gestation, classified as SGA (estimated fetal weight < 10th centile). The AGA cohort consisted of singleton pregnancies deemed at high risk of being SGA, which were followed up longitudinally but remained AGA. Fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) and umbilical artery (UA)-PI were measured longitudinally and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated, and values were converted to multiples of the median. The last two measurements prior to delivery were included in the analysis. Longitudinal models for Doppler variables were developed using linear-mixed models and their accuracy in the prediction of stillbirth was tested using generalized linear models. A Bayesian framework was employed to compare the accuracy of longitudinal and standard (last-scan measurement) models. Results In total, 1549 AGA and 941 SGA pregnancies were included in the analysis. There were 30 (3.2%) and no stillbirth cases in the SGA and AGA groups, respectively. Change in MCA-PI, UA-PI and CPR with advancing gestation was significantly different between liveborn AGA and SGA fetuses, with a less pronounced difference with advancing gestation. Using the last measurement, the best models for the prediction of stillbirth in SGA pregnancies were those based on CPR (accuracy, 75.0%; 95% CI, 72.6-77.2%) and UA-PI (accuracy, 71.0%; 95% CI, 68.6-73.4%). The posterior probability of the standard CPR model having a higher accuracy compared with the UA-PI model was 97.2% (magnitude of change (MC), 3.9%; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.5-7.3%). The accuracies of the standard, compared with the longitudinal, models for UA-PI (71.0% vs 72.8%), MCA-PI (64.6% vs 63.8%) and CPR (75.0% vs 74.9%) in the prediction of stillbirth were not significantly different. The posterior probabilities for improvement in accuracy using longitudinal, compared with standard, assessment were 50.1% (MC, < 0.1%; 95% CrI,-3.3 to 3.3%), 35.2% (MC,-0.1%; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 2.8%) and 82.2% (MC, 1.9%; 95% CrI,-1.5 to 5.3%) for CPR, MCA-PI and UA-PI models, respectively. Therefore, change in Doppler parameters did not improve the accuracy of the prediction of stillbirth, compared with that of the last-scan measurement. Conclusion Longitudinal assessment of Doppler parameters was not useful in improving the detection of stillbirth in SGA pregnancies, as compared with a single-point assessment. Copyright (C) 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential placental DNA methylation of VEGFA and LEP in small-for-gestational age fetuses with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio
    Bekkering, Iris
    Leeuwerke, Mariette
    Tanis, Jozien C.
    Schoots, Mirthe H.
    Verkaik-Schakel, Rikst Nynke
    Plosch, Torsten
    Bilardo, Caterina M.
    Eijsink, Jasper J. H.
    Bos, Arend F.
    Scherjon, Sicco A.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [22] Timing of Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes for Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses
    Visentin, Silvia
    Londero, Ambrogio Pietro
    Grumolato, Francesca
    Trevisanuto, Daniele
    Zanardo, Vincenzo
    Ambrosini, Guido
    Cosmi, Erich
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (10) : 1721 - 1728
  • [23] Maternal rest improves growth in small-for-gestational-age fetuses (<10th percentile)
    Devore, Greggory R.
    Polanco, Bardo
    Lee, Wesley
    Fowlkes, Jeffrey Brian
    Peek, Emma E.
    Putra, Manesha
    Hobbins, John C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 232 (01) : 118e1 - 118e12
  • [24] Assessment of Atrial Size, Shape, and Contractility in Growth-Restricted and Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses
    Devore, Greggory R.
    Putra, Manesha
    Hobbins, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [25] Risk Factors for Recurrent Small-for-Gestational-Age Birth
    Okah, Felix A.
    Cai, Jinwen
    Dew, Paul C.
    Hoff, Gerald L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [26] Balancing the risks of stillbirth and neonatal death in the early preterm small-for-gestational-age fetus
    Trudell, Amanda S.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Macones, George A.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (03)
  • [27] Evaluation of Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas in Assessing Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses
    Barel, O.
    Maymon, R.
    Elovits, M.
    Smorgick, N.
    Tovbin, J.
    Vaknin, Z.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2016, 37 (03): : 283 - 289
  • [28] Should Bilateral Uterine Artery Notching Be Used in the Risk Assessment for Preeclampsia, Small-for-Gestational-Age, and Gestational Hypertension?
    Espinoza, Jimmy
    Kusanovic, Juan Pedro
    Bahado-Singh, Ray
    Gervasi, Maria Teresa
    Romero, Roberto
    Lee, Wesley
    Vaisbuch, Edi
    Mazaki-Tovi, Shali
    Mittal, Pooja
    Gotsch, Francesca
    Erez, Offer
    Gomez, Ricardo
    Yeo, Lami
    Hassan, Sonia S.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (07) : 1103 - 1115
  • [29] Induction of labor for term small-for-gestational-age fetuses: what are the consequences?
    Ofir, Keren
    Lerner-Geva, Liat
    Boyko, Valentina
    Zilberberg, Eran
    Schiff, Eyal
    Simchen, Michal J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 171 (02) : 257 - 261
  • [30] Inadequate identification of small-for-gestational-age fetuses at an urban teaching hospital
    Mattioli, Kathleen Powell
    Sanderson, Maureen
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 109 (02) : 140 - 143