Hospital contextual factors affecting the implementation of health technologies: a systematic review

被引:14
作者
Grossi, Adriano [1 ]
Hoxhaj, Ilda [1 ]
Gabutti, Irene [2 ]
Specchia, Maria Lucia [1 ,3 ]
Cicchetti, Americo [2 ]
Boccia, Stefania [1 ,4 ]
de Waure, Chiara [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Univ Dept Life Sci & Publ Hlth, Sect Hyg, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fac Econ, Grad Sch Hlth Econ & Management ALTE MS, Rome, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Clin Governance Unit, Rome, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Publ Hlth Area, Dept Woman & Child Hlth & Publ Hlth, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, Dept Med & Surg, Perugia, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Technology; Implementation; Hospital; Systematic review; Health technology assessment; OVERCOMING BARRIERS; ADOPTION; CARE; INFORMATION; RECORDS; FACILITATORS; RECOMMENDATIONS; DETERMINANTS; INNOVATIONS; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-021-06423-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To keep a high quality of assistance it is important for hospitals to invest in health technologies (HTs) that have the potential of improving health outcomes. Even though guidance exists on how HTs should be introduced, used and dismissed, there is a surprising gap in literature concerning the awareness of hospitals in the actual utilization of HTs. Methods We performed a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative studies aimed at investigating hospital contextual factors that influence the actual utilization of HTs. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit and Ovid Medline electronic databases were searched to retrieve articles published in English and Italian from January 2000 to January 2019. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the cross-sectional studies and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed method studies. Results We included 33 articles, which were of moderate to high methodological quality. The included articles mostly addressed the contextual factors that impact the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Overall, for all HTs, the hospital contextual factors were part of four categories: hospital infrastructure, human resource management, financial resources and leadership styles. Conclusion Our systematic review reported that the contextual factors influencing the HTs utilization at hospital level are mainly explored for ICTs. Several factors should be considered when planning the implementation of a new HTs at hospital level. A potential publication bias might be present in our work, since we included articles published only in English and Italian Language, from January 2000 to January 2019. There remains a gap in the literature on the facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation and concrete utilization of medical and surgical HTs, suggesting the need for further studies for a better understanding.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   The preferences of users of electronic medical records in hospitals: quantifying the relative importance of barriers and facilitators of an innovation [J].
Struik, Marjolijn H. L. ;
Koster, Ferry ;
Schuit, A. Jantine ;
Nugteren, Rutger ;
Veldwijk, Jorien ;
Lambooij, Mattijs S. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
[52]  
Szydlowski Steven, 2009, Hosp Top, V87, P3, DOI 10.3200/HTPS.87.1.3-9
[53]   Organizational learning in the implementation and adoption of national electronic health records: Case studies of two hospitals participating in the National Programme for Information Technology in England [J].
Takian, Amirhossein ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
Barber, Nicholas .
HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (03) :199-212
[54]   Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project [J].
Tarricone, Rosanna ;
Torbica, Aleksandra ;
Drummond, Michael .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 :145-152
[55]   Context Matters: The Experience of 14 Research Teams in Systematically Reporting Contextual Factors Important for Practice Change [J].
Tomoaia-Cotisel, Andrada ;
Scammon, Debra L. ;
Waitzman, Norman J. ;
Cronholm, Peter F. ;
Halladay, Jacqueline R. ;
Driscoll, David L. ;
Solberg, Leif I. ;
Hsu, Clarissa ;
Tai-Seale, Ming ;
Hiratsuka, Vanessa ;
Shih, Sarah C. ;
Fetters, Michael D. ;
Wise, Christopher G. ;
Alexander, Jeffrey A. ;
Hauser, Diane ;
McMullen, Carmit K. ;
Scholle, Sarah Hudson ;
Tirodkar, Manasi A. ;
Schmidt, Laura ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Parchman, Michael L. ;
Stange, Kurt C. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 11 :S115-S123
[56]  
Toronto: Health Quality Ontario Health Technology Assessment, HLTH QUAL ONT HQO
[57]   Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations [J].
Tuot, Delphine S. ;
Leeds, Kiren ;
Murphy, Elizabeth J. ;
Sarkar, Urmimala ;
Lyles, Courtney R. ;
Mekonnen, Tekeshe ;
Chen, Alice Hm .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[58]   Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan [J].
Urowitz, Sara ;
Wiljer, David ;
Apatu, Emma ;
Eysenbach, Gunther ;
DeLenardo, Claudette ;
Harth, Tamara ;
Pai, Howard ;
Leonard, Kevin J. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)
[59]   Maximizing Healthcare Professionals' Use of New Computer Technologies in a Small, Urban Hospital's Critical Care Unit [J].
Vadillo, Patricia C. ;
Rojo, Estrellita S. ;
Garces, Adelaida ;
Checton, Maria G. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 61 (05) :352-362
[60]   The determinants of medical technology adoption in different decisional systems: A systematic literature review [J].
Varabyova, Yauheniya ;
Blankart, Carl Rudolf ;
Greer, Ann Lennarson ;
Schreyoegg, Jonas .
HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (03) :230-242