MICROPERIMETRY AND FUNDUS AUTOFLUORESCENCE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA Subthreshold Micropulse Diode Laser Versus Modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Laser Photocoagulation

被引:156
|
作者
Vujosevic, Stela [1 ]
Bottega, Elisa [2 ]
Casciano, Margherita [2 ]
Pilotto, Elisabetta [2 ]
Convento, Enrica [2 ]
Midena, Edoardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fondaz GB Bietti, IRCCS, I-00198 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Ophthalmol, Padua, Italy
来源
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES | 2010年 / 30卷 / 06期
关键词
diabetic macular edema; fundus autofluorescence; laser treatment; micropulse diode laser; microperimetry; OCT;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c96986
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) after subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial including 62 eyes (50 patients) with untreated, center-involving, clinically significant diabetic macular edema was performed. All patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity determination (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), slit-lamp biomicroscopy, FAF, optical coherence tomography, microperimetry (macular sensitivity), and fluorescein angiography before and after treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity, optical coherence tomography, microperimetry, and FAF were repeated at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up examinations. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Results: Before treatment, demographic and macular parameters were not different between the two treatment groups. At 12 months, best-corrected visual acuity remained stable in both groups (P = 0.41 and P = 0.82), mean central retinal thickness decreased in both groups (P = 0.0002 and P < 0.0001), and mean central 4 degrees and 12 degrees retinal sensitivity increased in the micropulse diode laser group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.0075) and decreased in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study group (P = 0.2 and P = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in either best-corrected visual acuity or central retinal thickness between the 2 treatment groups (P = 0.48 and P = 0.29), whereas there was a significant difference in 4 degrees and 12 degrees retinal sensitivity (P = 0.04 and P, 0.0001). Fundus autofluorescence never changed in the micropulse diode laser group even after retreatment. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study group, FAF increased up to 9 months and decreased in 6 eyes (20%) at 12 months. Discussion: Micropulse diode laser seems to be as effective as modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study laser photocoagulation in the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Micropulse diode laser treatment does not determine any change on FAF showing (at least) nonclinically visible damage of the retinal pigment epithelium. Microperimetry data encourage the use of a new, less aggressive laser therapeutic approach in the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular edema. RETINA 30: 908-916, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 916
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular edema
    Sivaprasad, Sobha
    Dorin, Giorgio
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2012, 9 (02) : 189 - 197
  • [2] Subthreshold Micropulse Diode Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema in Japanese Patients
    Ohkoshi, Kishiko
    Yamaguchi, Tatsuo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 149 (01) : 133 - 139
  • [3] Comparison of subthreshold diode laser micropulse therapy versus conventional photocoagulation laser therapy as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema
    Fazel, Farhad
    Bagheri, Majid
    Golabchi, Khodayar
    Ardakani, Hamidreza Jahanbani
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04): : 206 - 211
  • [4] Subthreshold Micropulse Diode Laser Photocoagulation As Monotherapy For Mild to Moderate Diabetic Macular Edema
    Adyanthaya, Rohit
    Zavala, Gabriela
    Gonzalez, Victor
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [5] Comparison of subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation with conventional laser photocoagulation for clinically significant macular edema in diabetic patients
    Grigorian, RA
    Zarbin, M
    Tutela, AC
    Bhagat, N
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U417 - U417
  • [6] Serial optical coherence tomography of subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema
    Luttrull, Jeffrey K.
    Spink, Charles J.
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2006, 37 (05) : 370 - 377
  • [7] Effects of subthreshold diode micropulse laser photocoagulation on treating patients with refractory diabetic macular edema
    Akhlaghi, Mohammadreza
    Dehghani, Alireza
    Pourmohammadi, Reza
    Asadpour, Leila
    Pourazizi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 31 (02): : 157 - 160
  • [8] Subthreshold diode-laser micropulse photocoagulation as a primary and secondary line of treatment in management of diabetic macular edema
    Othman, Ihab Saad
    Eissa, Sherif Ahmed
    Kotb, Mohamed S.
    Sadek, Sherin Hassan
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 653 - 659
  • [9] Retinal layers and microperimetry changes after subthreshold micropulse laser in the treatment of diabetic macular edema
    Midena, Giulia
    Vujosevic, Stela
    Martini, Ferdinando
    Convento, Enrica
    Pilotto, Elisabetta
    Federici, Matteo
    Pagliei, Valeria
    Minnella, Angelo Maria
    Midena, Edoardo
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [10] Comparison of subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation with conventional laser photocoagulation for clinically significant macular edema in diabetic patients.
    Grigorian, RA
    Zarbin, MA
    Brimacombe, M
    Tutela, A
    Roy, M
    Bhagat, N
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U362 - U362