Ab initio based classical electrostatic potentials for the interaction between molecules and surfaces

被引:38
|
作者
ChaconTaylor, MR [1 ]
McCarthy, MI [1 ]
机构
[1] PACIFIC NW NATL LAB,ENVIROMN MOL SCI LAB,RICHLAND,WA 99352
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY | 1996年 / 100卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp953513e
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations based on interactions described by hybrid quantum-classical methods are a logical approach to the study of solvent-molecule and solvent-surface interfaces. These techniques exploit the classical nature of long-range interactions to provide a computationally tractable description of complex interfacial systems. The present work develops and tests the performance of a classical electrostatic potential for describing adsorbate/surface interactions. The electrostatic potential is constructed from a numerical representation of the electric potential, field, and field gradients of the bare surface, as a function of position above the surface, combined with the electric multipolar moments of the adsorbate molecules. The former is obtained from periodic Hartree-Fock calculations on the bare surface; the latter is from molecular Hartree-Fock calculations on the isolated molecules. An empirical, short-range repulsive term is added to the classical ''long-range'' expression for the interaction. The resulting potential is then tested by comparison to periodic Hartree-Fock calculations on the combined adsorbate-surface system. This allows the accuracy of the classical approximation to be evaluated independent of the level of theory used to compute the electronic charge densities. Results are presented for H2O, HCl, and NH3 adsorbates on the (001) surface of MgO.
引用
收藏
页码:7610 / 7616
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exchange repulsion between effective fragment potentials and ab initio molecules
    Kemp, Daniel D.
    Rintelman, Jamie M.
    Gordon, Mark S.
    Jensen, Jan H.
    THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS, 2010, 125 (3-6) : 481 - 491
  • [2] Exchange repulsion between effective fragment potentials and ab initio molecules
    Daniel D. Kemp
    Jamie M. Rintelman
    Mark S. Gordon
    Jan H. Jensen
    Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2010, 125 : 481 - 491
  • [3] Classical interaction potentials for diverse materials from ab initio data: a review of potfit
    Brommer, Peter
    Kiselev, Alexander
    Schopf, Daniel
    Beck, Philipp
    Roth, Johannes
    Trebin, Hans-Rainer
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 23 (07)
  • [4] Ab initio insights into the interaction mechanisms between boron, nitrogen and oxygen doped diamond surfaces and water molecules
    Latorre, Carlos Ayestaran
    Ewen, James P.
    Dini, Daniele
    Righi, M. C.
    CARBON, 2021, 171 : 575 - 584
  • [5] Ab-initio electrostatic potentials and mean inner potentials of concentrated NaClaq
    Sellner, Bernhard
    Kathmann, Shawn
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [6] Accurately Reproducing Ab Initio Electrostatic Potentials with Multipoles and Fragmentation
    Le, Hai-Anh
    Lee, Adrian M.
    Bettens, Ryan P. A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2009, 113 (39): : 10527 - 10533
  • [7] Ab Initio Study on the Conformation and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials of the Acetylcholine
    Wang Yibo
    Shi Hongyun
    ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA, 1996, 12 (06) : 518 - 522
  • [8] Comparison between classical potentials and ab initio methods for silicon under large shear
    Godet, J
    Pizzagalli, L
    Brochard, S
    Beauchamp, P
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2003, 15 (41) : 6943 - 6953
  • [9] Classical and ab initio molecular dynamics of quartz surfaces
    MacKerell, Alexander D., Jr.
    Lopes, Pedro E. M.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U1333 - U1334
  • [10] Ab initio based tight-binding hamiltonian for the dissociation of molecules at surfaces
    Gross, A
    Scheffler, M
    Mehl, MJ
    Papaconstantopoulos, DA
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 82 (06) : 1209 - 1212