Utility of Multi-Modal MRI for Differentiating of Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Using Machine Learning

被引:31
作者
Talai, Aron S. [1 ]
Sedlacik, Jan [2 ]
Boelmans, Kai [3 ,4 ]
Forkert, Nils D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Radiol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Neuroradiol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Neurol, Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Dept Neurol, Bremerhaven, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; computer-assisted image analysis; Parkinson' s disease; progressive supranuclear palsy; CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS; BRAIN IRON; CRITERIA; ATROPHY; VARIANT;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2021.648548
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS) often show overlapping clinical features, leading to misdiagnoses. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and utility of using multi-modal MRI datasets for an automatic differentiation of PD patients, PSP-RS patients, and healthy control (HC) subjects. Material and Methods: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-tensor (DTI) MRI datasets from 45 PD patients, 20 PSP-RS patients, and 38 HC subjects were available for this study. Using an atlas-based approach, regional values of brain morphology (T1-weighted), brain iron metabolism (T2-weighted), and microstructural integrity (DTI) were measured and employed for feature selection and subsequent classification using combinations of various established machine learning methods. Results: The optimal machine learning model using regional morphology features only achieved a classification accuracy of 65% (67/103 correct classifications) differentiating PD patients, PSP-RS patients, and HC subjects. The optimal machine learning model using only quantitative T2 values performed slightly better and achieved an accuracy of 75.7% (78/103). The optimal classifier using DTI features alone performed considerably better with 95.1% accuracy (98/103). The optimal multi-modal classifier using all features also achieved an accuracy of 95.1% but required more features and achieved a slightly lower F1-score compared to the optimal model using DTI features alone. Conclusion: Machine learning models using multi-modal MRI perform significantly better than uni-modal machine learning models using morphological parameters based on T1-weighted MRI datasets alone or brain iron metabolism markers based on T2-weighted MRI datasets alone. However, machine learnig models using regional brain microstructural integrity metrics computed from DTI datasets perform similar to the optimal multi-modal machine learning model. Thus, given the results from this study cohort, it appears that morphology and brain iron metabolism markers may not provide additional value for classification compared to using DTI metrics alone.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain
    Avants, B. B.
    Epstein, C. L.
    Grossman, M.
    Gee, J. C.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2008, 12 (01) : 26 - 41
  • [2] A Method for Automated Classification of Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis Using an Ensemble Average Propagator Template Brain Map Estimated from Diffusion MRI
    Banerjee, Monami
    Okun, Michael S.
    Vaillancourt, David E.
    Vemuri, Baba C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [3] Brain iron deposition fingerprints in Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy
    Boelmans, Kai
    Holst, Brigitte
    Hackius, Marc
    Finsterbusch, Juergen
    Gerloff, Christian
    Fiehler, Jens
    Muenchau, Alexander
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2012, 27 (03) : 421 - 427
  • [4] Advances in progressive supranuclear palsy: new diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, and therapeutic approaches
    Boxer, Adam L.
    Yu, Jin-Tai
    Golbe, Lawrence I.
    Litvan, Irene
    Lang, Anthony E.
    Hoeglinger, Guenter U.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (07) : 552 - 563
  • [5] Magnetic resonance support vector machine discriminates between Parkinson disease and progressive supranuclear palsy
    Cherubini, Andrea
    Morelli, Maurizio
    Nistico, Rita
    Salsone, Maria
    Arabia, Gennarina
    Vasta, Roberta
    Augimeri, Antonio
    Caligiuri, Maria Eugenia
    Quattrone, Aldo
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2014, 29 (02) : 266 - 269
  • [6] Automated Computer Differential Classification in Parkinsonian Syndromes via Pattern Analysis on MRI
    Duchesne, Simon
    Rolland, Yan
    Verin, Marc
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [7] Differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and healthy controls using magnetization transfer imaging
    Eckert, T
    Sailer, M
    Kaufmann, J
    Schrader, C
    Peschel, T
    Bodammer, N
    Heinze, HJ
    Schoenfeld, MA
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 21 (01) : 229 - 235
  • [8] Individual Voxel-Based Subtype Prediction can Differentiate Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from Idiopathic Parkinson Syndrome and Healthy Controls
    Focke, Niels K.
    Helms, Gunther
    Scheewe, Sebstian
    Pantel, Pia M.
    Bachmann, Cornelius G.
    Dechent, Peter
    Ebentheuer, Jens
    Mohr, Alexander
    Paulus, Walter
    Trenkwalder, Claudia
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2011, 32 (11) : 1905 - 1915
  • [9] ANTONIA Perfusion and Stroke A Software Tool for the Multi-purpose Analysis of MR Perfusion-weighted Datasets and Quantitative Ischemic Stroke Assessment
    Forkert, N. D.
    Cheng, B.
    Kemmling, A.
    Thomalla, G.
    Fiehler, J.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2014, 53 (06) : 469 - 481
  • [10] Automated Volumes-of-Interest Identification for Classical and Atypical Parkinsonian Syndrome Differentiation Using T2′ MR Imaging
    Forkert, N. D.
    Schmidt-Richberg, A.
    Treszl, A.
    Hilgetag, C.
    Fiehler, J.
    Muenchau, A.
    Handels, H.
    Boelmans, K.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2013, 52 (02) : 128 - 136