The Role of Cannabinoids in Neuroanatomic Alterations in Cannabis Users

被引:151
作者
Lorenzetti, Valentina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Solowij, Nadia [4 ,5 ]
Yuecel, Murat [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Monash Inst Cognit & Clin Neurosci, Brain & Mental Hlth Lab, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Neuropsychiat Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Melbourne Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Hlth Initiat, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth & Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Cannabidiol; Cannabinoids; Cannabis; CBD; Hippocampus; Prefrontal; THC; HIGH-POTENCY CANNABIS; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MARIJUANA USE; HUMAN BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; CHRONIC DELTA(9)-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL; SCREENING INSTRUMENT; HIPPOCAMPAL VOLUME; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS; NEURAL MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.013
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The past few decades have seen a marked change in the composition of commonly smoked cannabis. These changes primarily involve an increase of the psychoactive compound Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and a decrease of the potentially therapeutic compound cannabidiol (CBD). This altered composition of cannabis may be linked to persistent neuroanatomic alterations typically seen in regular cannabis users. In this review, we summarize recent findings from human structural neuroimaging investigations. We examine whether neuroanatomic alterations are 1) consistently observed in samples of regular cannabis users, particularly in cannabinoid receptor-high areas, which are vulnerable to the effects of high circulating levels of THC, and 2) associated either with greater levels of cannabis use (e.g., higher dosage, longer duration, and earlier age of onset) or with distinct cannabinoid compounds (i.e., THC and CBD). Across the 31 studies selected for inclusion in this review, neuroanatomic alterations emerged across regions that are high in cannabinoid receptors (i.e., hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, cerebellum). Greater dose and earlier age of onset were associated with these alterations. Preliminary evidence shows that THC exacerbates, whereas CBD protects from, such harmful effects. Methodologic differences in the quantification of levels of cannabis use prevent accurate assessment of cannabis exposure and direct comparison of findings across studies. Consequently, the field lacks large "consortium-style" data sets that can be used to develop reliable neurobiological models of cannabis-related harm, recovery, and protection. To move the field forward, we encourage a coordinated approach and suggest the urgent development of consensus-based guidelines to accurately and comprehensively quantify cannabis use and exposure in human studies.
引用
收藏
页码:E17 / E31
页数:15
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Adams IB, 1996, ADDICTION, V91, P1585, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb02264.x
[2]   A prototype screening instrument for cannabis use disorder: the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in an alcohol-dependent clinical sample [J].
Adamson, SJ ;
Sellman, JD .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2003, 22 (03) :309-315
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEUROPATHOLOGY DRUG
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADDICTION SEVERITY I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EGYPT J FORENSICSCI, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJFS.2013.10.001
[6]  
[Anonymous], ORG HUM BRAIN MAPP J
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT CHALLENGE DRUG A
[8]  
[Anonymous], ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT
[9]  
[Anonymous], PHARM MARIHUANA
[10]  
[Anonymous], WORLD DRUG REP 2009