Institutional pressures as drivers of circular economy in firms: A machine learning approach

被引:61
作者
Arranz, Carlos F. A. [1 ]
Sena, Vania [2 ]
Kwong, Caleb [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Elmer Approach, Southend on Sea, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Western Bank, Sheffield, England
关键词
Institutional pressures; Circular economy; Machine learning; ANN Model; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS MODELS; ECO-INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; GREEN; ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131738
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how institutional pressures affect the development of Circular Economy (CE) in firms. Using Institutional Entrepreneurship as a theoretical framework, this paper considers three different levels of institutional pressures (coercive, normative, and mimetic) to examine the effect of each pressure and their interactions on the development of CE. Seeking to clarify the debate on the effect of institutional pressures, this paper considers that the main limitation arises from the fact that previous research has analysed the relationship between institutional pressures without considering the interaction between them and the non-linearity of the processes. Deviating from previous papers, our analysis combines regression methods with Machine learning (i.e. Artificial Neural Networks), and employs data from the EU survey on Public Consultation on the Circular Economy. This research finds that while coercive pressures have a compulsory effect on the development of CE, mimetic and normative pressures do not have an effect by themselves, but only in interaction with coercive pressures. Moreover, this paper shows that the application of machine learning tools has an important contribution in solving interaction problems. From the perspective of environmental policy, this means that a comprehensive policy is required, which implies the coexistence or interaction of the three types of pressures.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Institutional entrepreneurship, practice memory, and cultural memory: Choice and creativity in the pursuit of endogenous change of local authority budgeting [J].
Ahrens, Thomas ;
Ferry, Laurence .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2018, 38 :12-21
[2]   Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: The pressure of social responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices [J].
Alda, Mercedes .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (06) :1060-1071
[3]  
Alloghani M., 2020, Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2, 10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2_1]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Elements of artificial neural networks
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PUBL CONS CIRC EC
[6]   The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations [J].
Aragon-Correa, Juan Alberto ;
Leyva-de la Hiz, Dante I. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 25 (06) :421-434
[7]   The role of institutional actors and their interactions in the land use policy making process in Ethiopia [J].
Ariti, Adenew Taffa ;
van Vliet, Jasper ;
Verburg, Peter H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 237 :235-246
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]   Incentives and inhibiting factors of eco-innovation in the Spanish firms [J].
Arranz, N. ;
Arroyabe, M. F. ;
Molina-Garcia, A. ;
Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 :167-176
[10]   Alliance-building Process as Inhibiting Factor for SME International Alliances [J].
Arranz, N. ;
Arroyabe, M. F. ;
de Arroyabe, J. C. Fdez .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (03) :497-515