Gene Co-Expression Networks Restructured Gene Fusion in Rhabdomyosarcoma Cancers

被引:5
|
作者
Helm, Bryan R. [1 ]
Zhan, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Pandya, Pankita H. [3 ]
Murray, Mary E. [3 ]
Pollok, Karen E. [3 ,4 ]
Renbarger, Jamie L. [3 ]
Ferguson, Michael J. [3 ]
Han, Zhi [4 ]
Ni, Dong [2 ]
Zhang, Jie [5 ]
Huang, Kun [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasoun, Sch Biomed Engn,Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[5] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med & Mol Genet, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[6] Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
rhabdomyosarcoma; gene fusion; gene co-expression analysis; quasi-clique merger; copy number variation; QUESTIONABLE UNIVERSAL VALIDITY; ALVEOLAR RHABDOMYOSARCOMA; MOLECULAR MARKER; RISK STRATIFICATION; GENOMIC ANALYSIS; PAX3-FOXO1; IDENTIFICATION; PATHOGENESIS; IMPROVEMENT; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.3390/genes10090665
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Rhabdomyosarcoma is subclassified by the presence or absence of a recurrent chromosome translocation that fuses the FOXO1 and PAX3 or PAX7 genes. The fusion protein (FOXO1-PAX3/7) retains both binding domains and becomes a novel and potent transcriptional regulator in rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes. Many studies have characterized and integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic differences among rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes that contain the FOXO1-PAX3/7 gene fusion and those that do not; however, few investigations have investigated how gene co-expression networks are altered by FOXO1-PAX3/7. Although transcriptional data offer insight into one level of functional regulation, gene co-expression networks have the potential to identify biological interactions and pathways that underpin oncogenesis and tumorigenicity. Thus, we examined gene co-expression networks for rhabdomyosarcoma that were FOXO1-PAX3 positive, FOXO1-PAX7 positive, or fusion negative. Gene co-expression networks were mined using local maximum Quasi-Clique Merger (lmQCM) and analyzed for co-expression differences among rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes. This analysis observed 41 co-expression modules that were shared between fusion negative and positive samples, of which 17/41 showed significant up- or down-regulation in respect to fusion status. Fusion positive and negative rhabdomyosarcoma showed differing modularity of co-expression networks with fusion negative (n = 109) having significantly more individual modules than fusion positive (n = 53). Subsequent analysis of gene co-expression networks for PAX3 and PAX7 type fusions observed 17/53 were differentially expressed between the two subtypes. Gene list enrichment analysis found that gene ontology terms were poorly matched with biological processes and molecular function for most co-expression modules identified in this study; however, co-expressed modules were frequently localized to cytobands on chromosomes 8 and 11. Overall, we observed substantial restructuring of co-expression networks relative to fusion status and fusion type in rhabdomyosarcoma and identified previously overlooked genes and pathways that may be targeted in this pernicious disease.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systemic Bioinformatic Exploration of Gene Co-Expression Networks in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Wang, Shen-Yung
    Huang, Yen-Hua
    Chiu, Yen-Jung
    Wu, Jaw-Ching
    HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : 541A - 542A
  • [32] Comparison of confound adjustment methods in the construction of gene co-expression networks
    Alanna C. Cote
    Hannah E. Young
    Laura M. Huckins
    Genome Biology, 23
  • [33] Computational Ensemble Gene Co-Expression Networks for the Analysis of Cancer Biomarkers
    Figueroa-Martinez, Julia
    Saz-Navarro, Dulcenombre M.
    Lopez-Fernandez, Aurelio
    Rodriguez-Baena, Domingo S.
    Gomez-Vela, Francisco A.
    INFORMATICS-BASEL, 2024, 11 (02):
  • [34] Corticolimbic DCC gene co-expression networks as predictors of impulsivity in children
    Jose M. Restrepo-Lozano
    Irina Pokhvisneva
    Zihan Wang
    Sachin Patel
    Michael J. Meaney
    Patricia P. Silveira
    Cecilia Flores
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2022, 27 : 2742 - 2750
  • [35] Comparison of confound adjustment methods in the construction of gene co-expression networks
    Cote, Alanna C.
    Young, Hannah E.
    Huckins, Laura M.
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [36] Juxtapose: a gene-embedding approach for comparing co-expression networks
    Katie Ovens
    Farhad Maleki
    B. Frank Eames
    Ian McQuillan
    BMC Bioinformatics, 22
  • [37] Juxtapose: a gene-embedding approach for comparing co-expression networks
    Ovens, Katie
    Maleki, Farhad
    Eames, B. Frank
    McQuillan, Ian
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [38] ForkJoinPcc Algorithm for Computing the Pcc Matrix in Gene Co-Expression Networks
    Alhussan, Amel Ali
    AlEisa, Hussah Nasser
    Atteia, Ghada
    Solouma, Nahed H.
    Abul Seoud, Rania Ahmed Abdel Azeem
    Ayoub, Ola S.
    Ghoneim, Vidan F.
    Samee, Nagwan Abdel
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [39] Gene Co-Expression Networks Offer New Perspectives on Sepsis Pathophysiology
    Martinez-Paz, Pedro
    Gomez-Pilar, Javier
    Martin-Fernandez, Marta
    Ceballos, Francisco C.
    Gomez-Sanchez, Esther
    Hornero, Roberto
    Tamayo, Eduardo
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 20 (06) : 3660 - 3668
  • [40] Ensemble and Greedy Approach for the Reconstruction of Large Gene Co-Expression Networks
    Gomez-Vela, Francisco
    Delgado-Chaves, Fernando M.
    Rodriguez-Baena, Domingo S.
    Garcia-Torres, Miguel
    Divina, Federico
    ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (12)