Factors influencing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy efficiency for optimal patient selection

被引:12
作者
Snicorius, Marius [1 ]
Bakavicius, Arnas [1 ]
Cekauskas, Albertas [1 ]
Miglinas, Marius [1 ]
Platkevicius, Gediminas [1 ]
Zelvys, Arunas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Univ, Fac Med, Inst Clin Med, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; kidney stones; stone volume; STONE-FREE STATUS; TRIPLE D SCORE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RENAL STONES; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; URETERAL STONES; SUCCESS; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5114/wiitm.2021.103915
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Current literature suggests various predictors related to the stone and patient, which could influence stone fragmentation and clearance rates. Aim: To establish clinical characteristics of stone disease for patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) which may predict the success of the procedure. Material and methods: One hundred and nine patients with renal stone disease diagnosed by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) who underwent ESWL between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in the study. Endpoints: patient being stone free (SF) or when < 4 mm fragments were detected. Age, gender, location, skin-to-stone distance, maximum stone length, stone volume, stone surface area, mean stone Hounsfield units (HU) and highest HU score were explored in uni- and multivariate regression analysis. Results: Stone size revealed the highest prognostic power for ESWL failure, where OR for stone volume and stone surface area were 1.06 (1.03-1.10) and 1.04 (1.02-1.06), respectively (all p < 0.01) while a tendency was observed for skin-to-stone distance 1.02 (1.00-1.03). The amount of energy applied during the procedure to one cubic milli-meter of stone volume (SMLI/stone volume) was predictive for treatment success (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.87, p < 0.01). Stone volume (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.14, p = 0.01) and stone surface area (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.02) remained as statistically significant prognostic factors for treatment failure. Conclusions: Both greater stone volume and stone surface area, as well as lower power delivered per stone volume unit during the ESWL procedure, were found to be significant factors and could be useful to predict treatment failure.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones - A multivariate analysis model [J].
Abdel-Khalek, M ;
Sheir, KZ ;
Mokhtar, AA ;
Eraky, L ;
Kenawy, M ;
Bazeed, M .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (02) :161-167
[2]   Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: A large-scale study at a single institution [J].
Abe, T ;
Akakura, K ;
Kawaguchi, M ;
Ueda, T ;
Ichikawa, T ;
Ito, H ;
Nozumi, K ;
Suzuki, K .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (07) :768-773
[3]   Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Bandi, Gaurav ;
Meiners, Ryan J. ;
Pickhardt, Perry J. ;
Nakada, Stephen Y. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) :524-528
[4]   Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach [J].
Cho, Kang Su ;
Do Jung, Hae ;
Ham, Won Sik ;
Chung, Doo Yong ;
Kang, Yong Jin ;
Jang, Won Sik ;
Kwon, Jong Kyou ;
Choi, Young Deuk ;
Lee, Joo Yong .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12)
[5]   Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter [J].
Delakas, D ;
Karyotis, I ;
Daskalopoulos, G ;
Lianos, E ;
Mavromanolakis, E .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :201-205
[6]   A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: The value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
El-Assmy, Ahmed M. ;
Mansour, Osama ;
Sheir, Khaled Z. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (06) :1688-1694
[7]   Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi [J].
Fankhauser, Christian D. ;
Hermanns, Thomas ;
Lieger, Laura ;
Diethelm, Olivia ;
Umbehr, Martin ;
Luginbuhl, Thomas ;
Sulser, Tullio ;
Muntener, Michael ;
Poyet, Cedric .
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (03) :364-369
[8]  
Garrido-Abad P, 2017, ARCH ESP UROL, V70, P715
[9]   Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi [J].
Gupta, NP ;
Ansari, MS ;
Kesarvani, P ;
Kapoor, A ;
Mukhopadhyay, S .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (09) :1285-1288
[10]   Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy [J].
Hameed, Diaa A. ;
Elgammal, Mohammed A. ;
ElGanainy, Ehab O. ;
Hageb, Adel ;
Mohammed, Khaled ;
El-Taher, Ahmed Mohamed ;
Mostafa, Mostafa Mohamed ;
Ahmed, Abdelfatah Ibrahim .
UROLITHIASIS, 2013, 41 (06) :511-515