A multianalyte PCR blood test outperforms single analyte ELISAs (chromogranin A, pancreastatin, neurokinin A) for neuroendocrine tumor detection

被引:96
作者
Modlin, Irvin M. [1 ]
Drozdov, Ignat [1 ]
Alaimo, Daniele [1 ]
Callahan, Stephen [1 ]
Teixiera, Nancy [1 ]
Bodei, Lisa [1 ]
Kidd, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Wren Labs, Branford, CT 06405 USA
关键词
biomarker; carcinoid; chromogranin A; gastroenteropancreatic; monoanalyte; multianalyte; multigene transcript; neuroendocrine; NET; neurokinin A; pancreastatin; PYY; PCR; proton pump inhibitor; HEPATIC METASTASES; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CARCINOID-TUMORS; BREAST CANCERS; MARKERS; PLASMA; EXPRESSION; PEPTIDE; SERUM; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1530/ERC-14-0190
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A critical requirement in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management is a sensitive, specific and reproducible blood biomarker test. We evaluated a PCR-based 51 transcript signature (NETest) and compared it to chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST) and neurokinin A (NKA). The multigene signature was evaluated in two groups: i) a validation set of 40 NETs and controls and ii) a prospectively collected group of NETs (n=41, 61% small intestinal, 50% metastatic, 44% currently treated and 41 age-sex matched controls). Samples were analyzed by a two-step PCR (51 marker genes) protocol and ELISAs for CgA, PST and NKA. Sensitivity comparisons included chi(2), non-parametric measurements, ROC curves and predictive feature importance (PFAI) analyses. NETest identified 38 of 41 NETs. Performance metrics were: sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 92.8%, positive predictive value 92.8% and negative predictive value 92.8%. Single analyte ELISA metrics were: CgA 76, 59, 65, and 71%; PST 63, 56, 59, and 61% and NKA 39, 93, 84, and 60%. The AUCs (ROC analysis) were: NETest: 0.96 +/- 0.025, CgA: 0.67 +/- 0.06, PST 0.56 +/- 0.06, NKA: 0.66 +/- 0.06. NETest significantly outperformed single analyte tests (area differences: 0.284-0.403, Z-statistic 4.85-5.9, P<0.0001). PFAI analysis determined NETest had most value (69%) in diagnosis (CgA (13%), PST (9%), and NKA (9%)). Test data were consistent with the validation set (NETest >95% sensitivity and specificity, AUC = 0.98 vs single analytes: 59-67% sensitivity, AUCs: 0.58-0.63). The NETest is significantly more sensitive and efficient (>93%) than single analyte assays (CgA, PST or NKA) in NET diagnosis. Blood-based multigene analytic measurement will facilitate early detection of disease recurrence and can predict therapeutic efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 628
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [71] Validation of serum versus plasma measurements of chromogranin A levels in patients with carcinoid tumors - Lack of correlation between absolute chromogranin A levels and symptom frequency
    Woltering, Eugene A.
    Hilton, Ruth S.
    Zolfoghary, Christy M.
    Thomson, Jessica
    Zietz, Stanley
    Go, Vay Liang W.
    Vinik, Aaron I.
    Vinik, Etta
    O'Dorisio, Thomas M.
    Mamikunian, Gregg
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2006, 33 (03) : 250 - 254
  • [72] Wu JT, 2000, ANN CLIN LAB SCI, V30, P175
  • [73] One hundred years after "Carcinoid": Epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States
    Yao, James C.
    Hassan, Manal
    Phan, Alexandria
    Dagohoy, Cecile
    Leary, Colleen
    Mares, Jeannette E.
    Abdalla, Eddie K.
    Fleming, Jason B.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Rashid, Asif
    Evans, Douglas B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (18) : 3063 - 3072
  • [74] Chromogranin A and Neuron-Specific Enolase as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Advanced pNET Treated with Everolimus
    Yao, James C.
    Pavel, Marianne
    Phan, Alexandria T.
    Kulke, Matthew H.
    Hoosen, Sakina
    Peter, Jessica St.
    Cherfi, Azzeddine
    Oberg, Kjell E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2011, 96 (12) : 3741 - 3749
  • [75] Predicting response to docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancers through genome-wide gene expression profiling
    Zembutsu, Hitoshi
    Suzuki, Yasuyo
    Sasaki, Aya
    Tsunoda, Tatsuhiko
    Okazaki, Minoru
    Yoshimoto, Masataka
    Hasegawa, Tadashi
    Hirata, Koichi
    Nakamura, Yusuke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 34 (02) : 361 - 370
  • [76] 2010, NAT BIOTECHNOL, V28, P431, DOI DOI 10.1038/NBT0510-431)