Equity and the willingness to pay for green electricity in Germany

被引:42
作者
Andor, Mark A. [1 ]
Frondel, Manuel [2 ,3 ]
Sommer, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] RWI Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Essen, Germany
[2] RWI Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Bochum, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Bochum, Germany
关键词
CONTINGENT VALUATION; PUBLIC-GOODS; PRIVATE PROVISION; FIELD; FAIRNESS; CONSEQUENTIALITY; PREFERENCES; CHOICE; BIAS; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41560-018-0233-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The production of electricity on the basis of renewable energy technologies is often discriminatively financed: the German energy-intensive sector, for instance, benefits from a far-reaching exemption rule, while all other electricity consumers are forced to bear a higher burden in the form of a higher surcharge on the net price of electricity. Here, we demonstrate that reducing this inequity in cost burden substantially raises household willingness to pay for green electricity. In a stated-choice experiment among about 11,000 households, participants who were informed about the energy industry exemption were less likely to accept an increase in the fixed surcharge per kilowatt hour than those who were not informed. However, participants who were informed about the industry exemption but then told that it would be abolished had significantly higher acceptance rates. This suggests that reducing inequity in the distribution of the cost burden increases the acceptance of bearing these costs. This outcome may have far-reaching implications for policymaking that extend to other domains where exemptions exist, such as carbon tax schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 881
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[12]   Energy taxes, voluntary agreements and investment subsidies-a micro-panel analysis of the effect on Danish industrial companies' energy demand [J].
Bjorner, TB ;
Jensen, HH .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2002, 24 (03) :229-249
[13]  
Blumenschein K, 2008, ECON J, V118, P114
[14]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[15]   The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study [J].
Bulte, E ;
Gerking, S ;
List, JA ;
de Zeeuw, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 49 (02) :330-342
[16]  
Bundesverband der Energieund Wasserwirtschaft, 2016, ERN EN EEG ZAHL FAKT
[17]   Distributional Preferences and the Incidence of Costs and Benefits in Climate Change Policy [J].
Cai, Beilei ;
Cameron, Trudy Ann ;
Gerdes, Geoffrey R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 46 (04) :429-458
[18]   Incentive and informational properties of preference questions [J].
Carson, Richard T. ;
Groves, Theodore .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) :181-210
[19]   Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice [J].
Carson, Richard T. ;
Groves, Theodore ;
List, John A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2014, 1 (1-2) :171-207
[20]   Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative when Prices Aren't Available [J].
Carson, Richard T. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (04) :27-42