Hidden social exclusion in Indian academia: gender, caste and conference participation

被引:20
作者
Sabharwal, Nidhi S. [1 ]
Henderson, Emily F. [2 ]
Joseph, Roma Smart [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Educ Planning & Adm, Ctr Policy Res Higher Educ, 17-B,Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Univ Warwick, Ctr Educ Studies, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Isabella Thoburn Coll, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Professional development; higher education; conferences; India; caste; gender; social exclusion; INTERSECTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1080/09540253.2019.1685657
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Conferences are key sites for the development of academic careers; however multiple studies have shown that conferences are exclusionary on the basis of gender and other axes of social disadvantage. This study focuses on India and as such also incorporates caste as an axis of privilege and disadvantage in relation to access to conferences. Conferences in this paper are framed within a broader professional development agenda, which is the way in which conferences are located in Indian higher education policy discourses, and a social exclusion perspective is taken as the analytical lens. The paper is based on data from a large-scale national study of social inequalities in higher education, which included quantitative analysis of administrative records and qualitative analysis of interviews with academics on their participation in conferences and professional development activities. Key findings include that participation in conferences is proportionally lower for women and scheduled caste academics than for men and upper-caste academics, and that access to conferences is embroiled in relational processes of social exclusion which operate in the academy, despite formal policies being in place. The article recommends further scrutiny of policy implementation and replication of this analysis across different country contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 42
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ahmed S., 2012, On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life, DOI 10.2307/j.ctv1131d2g
[2]  
Ambedkar B. R., 1950, MAHABODHI CALCUTTA, V59, P137
[3]  
Anandi Collective, 2009, DEVELOPMENT, V52, P208, DOI [10.1057/dev.2009.21, DOI 10.1057/DEV.2009.21]
[4]  
Ardener S., 1986, VISIBILITY POWER ESS, P3
[5]   INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies [J].
Bilge, Sirma .
DU BOIS REVIEW-SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON RACE, 2013, 10 (02) :405-424
[6]  
Borooah V. K., 2010, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V45, P31
[7]  
Borooah V K., 2015, Caste, Discrimination, and Exclusion in Modern India
[8]  
Buvinic Mayra., 2005, SOCIAL EXCLUSION EC, P3
[9]  
Chanana K., 2015, INDIA HIGHER ED REPO, P113
[10]  
David MiriamE., 2014, Feminism, Gender and Universities: Politics, Passion and Pedagogies