DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT OF UNIVERSITY SERVICE-LEARNING EXPERIENCES

被引:20
作者
Lopez-de-Arana Prado, Elena [1 ]
Aramburuzabala Higuera, Pilar [2 ]
Opazo Carvajal, Hector [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pais Vasco UPV EHU, Fac Educ & Deporte, Dept Didact & Org Escolar, Juan Ibanez Sto Domingo 1, Vitoria 01006, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Formac Profesorado & Educ, Dept Didact & Teoria Educ, Francisco Tomas & Valiente 3, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Catolica Silva Henriquez, Ctr Estudios Educ & Aprendizaje Basado Comunida, Gen Jofre 462, Santiago, Chile
来源
EDUCACION XX1 | 2020年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
Service Learning; Higher Education; Questionnaires; Self Evaluation; Validity; Delphi Technique; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; LIKERT-TYPE; FORMAT; ISSUES;
D O I
10.5944/educXX1.23834
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The number of university teachers that use service-learning as an alternative to traditional teaching and learning methods is increasing rapidly. This reality highlights the need to have tools that facilitate the design, implementation and evaluation processes for this new educational method. Currently, resources for ensuring the quality of service-learning experiences are scarce and often not validated. This paper describes the procedure followed for the design of the Questionnaire for Self-Assessment of University Service-Learning Experiences and its validation using the modified Delphi method online, which is a qualitative technique that aims to provide a reliable group response. In this study, two rounds of consultation were conducted by email, involving 16 academic experts who assessed the relevance and clarity of the items. While the first round of consultation aimed to analyze the relevance and clarity of all items, in the second round the clarity of the items which had been reformulated was analyzed. Results on the construct and content validity suggested the elimination or reformulation of some of the initial items. The final questionnaire was composed of 41 relevant and clear items, which are estimated through a 5 point Likert scale. Finally, two possible ways of giving continuity to this work are presented: to the opinion of experts who participate in service-learning but are not academic in the validation process; and to undertake a psychometric validation of the questionnaire through intra-test and inter-test methods.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 347
页数:29
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [41] Lozano LM., 2008, METHODOLOGY-EUR, V4, P73, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
  • [42] Ludwig B., 1997, Journal of Extension, V35, P1
  • [43] Martn-Garca X., 2018, Enseanza Teach, V36, P111, DOI [10.14201/et201836111128, DOI 10.14201/ET201836111128]
  • [44] Likert-Type Scale Format Design: State of Art
    Matas, Antonio
    [J]. REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2018, 20 (01): : 38 - 47
  • [45] McIlrath L., 2016, Europe Engage Survey of Civic Engagement and Service -Learning Activities within the Partner Universities. Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union
  • [46] Messick S., 1995, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V14, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.17453992.1995.tb00881.x
  • [47] Media Competence in University Teaching Staff. Validation of an Instrument of Evaluation
    Perez-Escoda, Ana
    Garcia-Ruiz, Rosa
    Aguaded-Gomez, Ignacio
    [J]. ATTIC-REVISTA D INNOVACIO EDUCATIVA, 2018, (21): : 1 - 9
  • [48] Pineiro E.M., 2003, Rev. Investig. Educ, V21, P449
  • [49] The Delphi technique: myths and realities
    Powell, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2003, 41 (04) : 376 - 382
  • [50] Price Bob, 2005, Nurs Older People, V17, P25