The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction

被引:151
作者
Guo, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Klauer, Sheila G. [1 ]
Fang, Youjia [1 ]
Hankey, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Antin, Jonathan F. [1 ]
Perez, Miguel A. [1 ]
Lee, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Dingus, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Transportat Inst, 3500 Transportat Res Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Stat, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
traffic crash risk; driver behaviour; distraction; SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study; case-cohort; NATURALISTIC DRIVING DATA; TEENAGE DRIVERS; OLDER DRIVERS; NOVICE; PERFORMANCE; PHONES; RATES;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyw234
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Driver distraction is a major contributing factor to crashes, which are the leading cause of death for the US population under 35 years of age. The prevalence of secondary-task engagement and its impacts on distraction and crashes may vary substantially by driver age. Methods: Driving performance and behaviour data were collected continuously using multiple cameras and sensors in situ for 3542 participant drivers recruited for up to 3 years for the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study. Secondary-task engagement at the onset of crashes and during normal driving segments was identified from videos. A case-cohort approach was used to estimate the crash odds ratios associated with, and the prevalence of, secondary tasks for four age groups: 1620, 21-29, 30-64 and 65-98 years of age. Only severe crashes (property damage and higher severity) were included in the analysis. Results: Secondary-task-induced distraction posed a consistently higher threat for drivers younger than 30 and above 65 when compared with middle-aged drivers, although senior drivers engaged in secondary tasks much less frequently than their younger counterparts. Secondary tasks with high visual-manual demand (e.g. visual-manual tasks performed on cell phones) affected drivers of all ages. Certain secondary tasks, such as operation of in-vehicle devices and talking/singing, increased the risk for only certain age groups. Conclusions: Teenaged, young adult drivers and senior drivers are more adversely impacted by secondary-task engagement than middle-aged drivers. Visual-manual distractions impact drivers of all ages, whereas cognitive distraction may have a larger impact on young drivers.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 265
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2 SHRP TRANSP RES BO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Tech. Rep. DOT-HS-810-593, DOI DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1228
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FMCSARRR09042
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Tech. Rep. DOT HS 810 594
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, TEEN DRIVER RISK REL
[6]   Cell phone use and traffic crash risk: a culpability analysis [J].
Asbridge, Mark ;
Brubacher, Jeff R. ;
Chan, Herbert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) :259-267
[7]   Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers [J].
Ball, K ;
Owsley, C ;
Stalvey, B ;
Roenker, DL ;
Sloane, ME ;
Graves, M .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1998, 30 (03) :313-322
[8]   Very old drivers: findings from a population cohort of people aged 84 and over [J].
Brayne, C ;
Dufouil, C ;
Ahmed, A ;
Dening, TR ;
Chi, LY ;
McGee, M ;
Huppert, FA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (04) :704-707
[9]   A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance [J].
Caird, Jeff K. ;
Willness, Chelsea R. ;
Steel, Piers ;
Scialfa, Chip .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2008, 40 (04) :1282-1293
[10]   Fatal crashes among older drivers: Decomposition of rates into contributing factors [J].
Dellinger, AM ;
Langlois, JA ;
Li, GH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 155 (03) :234-241