Experimental and numerical modeling on the liquefaction potential and ground settlement of silt-interlayered stratified sands

被引:33
作者
Ecemis, Nurhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Inst Technol Urla, Dept Civil Engn, TR-35430 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Stratified sands; Liquefaction deformation; Shake-table tests; Silt interlayers; Pore pressure distribution; CONE PENETRATION; LIQUEFIED SAND; WATER FILM; MECHANISM; LOCALIZATION; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEM; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106691
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Recent seismic events indicate that the simplified liquefaction-evaluation procedures are incapable of depicting general trends in liquefaction damage for stratified sands interlayered with silts. The conditions and mechanisms affecting the liquefaction potential of stratified sands exist in the field and ground settlement after liquefaction remain poorly understood. This work aims to investigate the seismic response of nonhomogeneous soil deposits by large-scale model tests and numerical simulations using an advanced constitutive model. A comprehensive experimental program was undertaken in which a total of three shake-table tests were performed on uniform sand and two stratified-sand deposits interlayered with different thicknesses of silt to investigate the ground settlement and distribution and dissipation of excess pore pressure during and after shaking. The shake-table test results and the numerical simulations of the silt-interlayered stratified sands, first indicate that the thickness of the silt seam has a significant influence on the liquefaction resistance of stratified-sand deposits beneath the silt layer. The second conclusion of this study reveals that the thickness and coefficient of consolidation of the silt and the liquefied sand below the silt layer significantly alter the degree of dissipation after the shake, and this causes different deformation/settlement at the ground surface. Therefore, there will be probably inaccuracies in applying simplified liquefaction evaluation procedures to the actual soil profile characterized by various patterns of layering in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Subsidence of building foundation resting upon liquefied subsoil: Case studies and assessment [J].
Acacio, AA ;
Kobayashi, Y ;
Towhata, I ;
Bautista, RT ;
Ishihara, K .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2001, 41 (06) :111-128
[2]   Behavior of stratified sand-silt-gravel composites under seismic liquefaction conditions [J].
Amini, F ;
Sama, KM .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 1999, 18 (06) :445-455
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FLAC FAST LAGR AN CO
[4]  
Beaty MichaelH., 2011, UBCSAND constitutive model version 904aR
[5]  
Bouckovalas G D., 2016, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Volume, V91, P329, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2016.09.028
[6]   Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests [J].
Byrne, PM ;
Park, SS ;
Beaty, M ;
Sharp, M ;
Gonzalez, L ;
Abdoun, T .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 41 (02) :193-211
[7]  
Cubrinovski M, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING VOLS 1-3, P393
[8]   System response of liquefiable deposits [J].
Cubrinovski, Misko ;
Rhodes, Aimee ;
Ntritsos, Nikolaos ;
Van Ballegooy, Sjoerd .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 124 :212-229
[9]   Influence of non-/low plastic fines on cone penetration and liquefaction resistance [J].
Ecemis, Nurhan ;
Karaman, Mustafa .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2014, 181 :48-57
[10]   Simulation of seismic liquefaction: 1-g model testing system and shaking table tests [J].
Ecemis, Nurhan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 17 (10) :899-919