Design for resilient performance: Concept and principles

被引:23
作者
Disconzi, Claudia Maria Dias Guerra [1 ]
Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ind Engn Postgrad Program, PPGEP UFRGS, Ave Osvaldo Aranha 99, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Resilient performance; Delphi method; Design; Complexity; Rapid response teams; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; METRICS; FUTURE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103707
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Resilient performance in socio-technical systems is usually described as stemming from people's self-organization and spur-of-the-moment actions and decisions. However, this is not exclusive with work system design ahead of time, with the deliberate intention of influencing resilient performance. This paper proposes a concept and principles of Design for Resilient Performance (DfRP), making explicit contributions that had been concealed and fragmented in the literature. Based on a literature review of influential human factors studies, 23 design principles were identified and set a basis for a Delphi study with 27 experts from nine countries. After three Delphi rounds, consensus was obtained and the DfRP concept was defined as well as seven design principles, namely: (i) there must be functional models of the system; (ii) make variations in performance visible; (iii) use the type of standardization that best fits the nature of the function; (iv) design slack resources and strategies; (v) design for acceptable performance even under degraded conditions; (vi) design must involve leveraging diverse perspectives; and (vii) design to support continuous learning at the individual and organisational level. The applicability of the principles is demonstrated through an exploratory case study of the rapid response team in a hospital. The principles of DfRP are contributions of prescriptive nature, which might give rise to more resilient socio-technical systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [11] PREDICTION OF AIR-TRAVEL AND AIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGY TO YEAR 2000 USING DELPHI METHOD
    ENGLISH, JM
    KERNAN, GL
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1976, 10 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [12] Fusch PI, 2015, QUAL REP, V20, P1408
  • [13] Guidance for Health Care Leaders During the Recovery Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic A Consensus Statement
    Geerts, Jaason M.
    Kinnair, Donna
    Taheri, Paul
    Abraham, Ajit
    Ahn, Joonmo
    Atun, Rifat
    Barberia, Lorena
    Best, Nigel J.
    Dandona, Rakhi
    Dhahri, Adeel Abbas
    Emilsson, Louise
    Free, Julian R.
    Gardam, Michael
    Geerts, William H.
    Ihekweazu, Chikwe
    Johnson, Shanthi
    Kooijman, Allison
    Lafontaine, Alika T.
    Leshem, Eyal
    Lidstone-Jones, Caroline
    Loh, Erwin
    Lyons, Oscar
    Neel, Khalid Ali Fouda
    Nyasulu, Peter S.
    Razum, Oliver
    Sabourin, Helene
    Schleifer Taylor, Jackie
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Stergiopoulos, Vicky
    Sutton, Brett
    Wu, Zunyou
    Bilodeau, Marc
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (07)
  • [14] Giannarou L., 2014, INT J BUSINESS SCI A, V9, DOI DOI 10.5430/JHA.V3N4P1
  • [15] Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review
    Hale, Andrew
    Borys, David
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 : 207 - 221
  • [16] Hendrick H.W., 2000, MACROERGONOMICS INTR
  • [17] Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems
    Hoffman, Robert R.
    Woods, David D.
    [J]. IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (06) : 67 - 71
  • [18] Hollnagel E., 2005, JOINT COGNITIVE SYST
  • [19] Hollnagel E., 2020, Synesis: The unification of productivity, quality, safety and reliability
  • [20] Hollnagel E., 2017, Resilience Engineering