Design for resilient performance: Concept and principles

被引:23
作者
Disconzi, Claudia Maria Dias Guerra [1 ]
Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ind Engn Postgrad Program, PPGEP UFRGS, Ave Osvaldo Aranha 99, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Resilient performance; Delphi method; Design; Complexity; Rapid response teams; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; METRICS; FUTURE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103707
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Resilient performance in socio-technical systems is usually described as stemming from people's self-organization and spur-of-the-moment actions and decisions. However, this is not exclusive with work system design ahead of time, with the deliberate intention of influencing resilient performance. This paper proposes a concept and principles of Design for Resilient Performance (DfRP), making explicit contributions that had been concealed and fragmented in the literature. Based on a literature review of influential human factors studies, 23 design principles were identified and set a basis for a Delphi study with 27 experts from nine countries. After three Delphi rounds, consensus was obtained and the DfRP concept was defined as well as seven design principles, namely: (i) there must be functional models of the system; (ii) make variations in performance visible; (iii) use the type of standardization that best fits the nature of the function; (iv) design slack resources and strategies; (v) design for acceptable performance even under degraded conditions; (vi) design must involve leveraging diverse perspectives; and (vii) design to support continuous learning at the individual and organisational level. The applicability of the principles is demonstrated through an exploratory case study of the rapid response team in a hospital. The principles of DfRP are contributions of prescriptive nature, which might give rise to more resilient socio-technical systems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Designing medical technology for resilience: integrating health economics and human factors approaches
    Borsci, Simone
    Uchegbu, Ijeoma
    Buckle, Peter
    Ni, Zhifang
    Walne, Simon
    Hanna, George B.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2018, 15 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [2] Changing how we think about healthcare improvement
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361
  • [3] Brians CL., 2016, Empirical Political Analysis
  • [4] Mimicking nature for resilient resource and infrastructure network design
    Chatterjee, Abheek
    Layton, Astrid
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 204
  • [5] PRINCIPLES OF SOCIOTECHNICAL DESIGN REVISTED
    CHERNS, A
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1987, 40 (03) : 153 - 162
  • [6] Measurement of resilience potential-development of a resilience assessment grid for emergency departments
    Chuang, Sheuwen
    Ou, Ju-Chi
    Hollnagel, Erik
    Hou, Sen-Kuang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [7] Clegg C., 2000, Handbook of Ergonomics
  • [8] Sociotechnical principles for system design
    Clegg, CW
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2000, 31 (05) : 463 - 477
  • [9] Advancing the State of Policy Delphi Practice: A Systematic Review Evaluating Methodological Evolution, Innovation, and Opportunities
    de Loe, Rob C.
    Melnychuk, Natalya
    Murray, Dan
    Plummer, Ryan
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 104 : 78 - 88
  • [10] Service Design for Resilience: A Multi-Contextual Modeling Perspective
    Dragoicea, Monica
    Walletzky, Leonard
    Carrubbo, Luca
    Badr, Nabil Georges
    Toli, Angeliki Maria
    Romanovska, Frantiska
    Ge, Mouzhi
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 185526 - 185543