Biomechanical Analysis of an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Pseudarthrosis Model Revised With Machined Interfacet Allograft Spacers

被引:6
|
作者
Hah, Raymond J. [1 ]
Alluri, Ram [1 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
关键词
interfacet allograft spacer; cervical interfacet allograft spacer; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; biomechanics; cervical pseudarthrosis; multilevel cervical fusion; facetal distraction; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; FACETAL DISTRACTION; INTERBODY FUSION; POSTERIOR; RADICULOPATHY; SPINE; FIXATION; REMOVAL; JOINTS;
D O I
10.1177/2192568219884265
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Biomechanics study. Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical advantage of interfacet allograft spacers in an unstable single-level and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) pseudoarthrosis model. Methods: Nine single-level and 8 two-level ACDF constructs were tested. Range of motion in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) at 1.5 N m were collected in 4 testing configurations: (1) intact spine, (2) ACDF with interbody graft and plate/screw, (3) ACDF with interbody graft and plate/loosened screws (loose condition), and (4) ACDF with interbody graft and plate/loosened screws supplemented with interfacet allograft spacers (rescue condition). Results: All fixation configurations resulted in statistically significant decreases in range of motion in all bending planes compared with the intact spine (P < .05). One Level. Performing ACDF with interbody graft and plate on the intact spine reduced FE, LB, and AR 60.0%, 64.9%, and 72.9%, respectively. Loosening the ACDF screws decreased these reductions to 40.9%, 44.6%, and 52.1%. The addition of interfacet allograft spacers to the loose condition increased these reductions to 74.0%, 84.1%, and 82.1%. Two Level. Performing ACDF with interbody graft and plate on the intact spine reduced FE, LB, and AR 72.0%, 71.1%, and 71.2%, respectively. Loosening the ACDF screws decreased these reductions to 55.4%, 55.3%, and 51.3%. The addition of interfacet allograft spacers to the loose condition significantly increased these reductions to 82.6%, 91.2%, and 89.3% (P < .05). Conclusions: Supplementation of a loose ACDF construct (pseudarthrosis model) with interfacet allograft spacers significantly increases stability and has potential applications in treating cervical pseudarthrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 981
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Morphologic Change of CorticoCancellous Allograft Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Yang, Jae Jun
    Ryu, Byungyoung
    Moon, Ji Weon
    Kim, Taehyun
    Park, Sehan
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (13) : 944 - 953
  • [32] A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease
    Xing, Dan
    Ma, Xin-Long
    Ma, Jian-Xiong
    Wang, Jie
    Ma, Tao
    Chen, Yang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (07) : 970 - 978
  • [33] Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis
    McClelland, Shearwood, III
    Oren, Jon H.
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Passias, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 34 : 166 - 168
  • [34] Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study
    Shen, Yi-Wei
    Yang, Yi
    Liu, Hao
    Qiu, Yue
    Li, Ming
    Ma, Li-Tai
    Gan, Fang-Ji
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [35] Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries
    Villavicencio, Alan T.
    Nelson, E. Lee
    Rajpal, Sharad
    Beasley, Kara
    Burneikiene, Sigita
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (15) : 1043 - 1054
  • [36] Biomechanical comparison of multiple zero-profile systems in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis
    Xiong-han Lian
    Wen-jia Sun
    Huo-huo Xue
    Yu-fan Chen
    Zhi-feng Zeng
    Jing-lai Xue
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20 (1)
  • [37] Biomechanical comparison of percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
    Ren, Jiabin
    Li, Rui
    Zhu, Kai
    Han, Xuexin
    Liu, Xin
    He, Yu
    Sun, Zhaozhong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [38] Assessing Postoperative Pseudarthrosis in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) on Dynamic Radiographs Using Novel Angular Measurements
    Balouch, Eaman
    Burapachaisri, Aonnicha
    Woo, Dainn
    Norris, Zoe
    Segar, Anand
    Ayres, Ethan W.
    Vasquez-Montes, Dennis
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Razi, Afshin
    Smith, Michael L.
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Kim, Yong H.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (16) : 1151 - 1156
  • [39] Is Structural Allograft Superior to Synthetic Graft Substitute in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Steelman, Theodore J.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    Seavey, Jonathan G.
    Gwinn, David E.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (07): : 274 - 277
  • [40] Titanium versus polyetheretherketone versus structural allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review
    Goldberg, Jacob L.
    Meaden, Ross M.
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    Quraishi, Danyal
    Sommer, Fabian
    Carnevale, Joseph A.
    Medary, Branden
    Wright, Drew
    Riew, K. Daniel
    Hartl, Roger
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2022, 2