Illocution and Social Relations: A Critical Analysis

In this paper, I claim that even though the conventional account of illocution (Sbisa, in Lodz Pap Pragmat 5(1):33-52, 2009a; In: B Fraser, K Turner (eds) Language in life, and a life in language. Emerald, pp 351-357, 2009b) makes an attempt to theorize social relations in illocutions, the attempt is unsuccessful. Sbisa's conventional account fails to describe the ways in which a fair social agreement can be established. A fair social agreement is a key element for the idea of social relations in the conventional account of illocution. However, considering the role of gender and power relations embedded in social construction, it is difficult to accept the possibility of such an agreement. Since Sbisa fails to provide a probe into power relations, her attempt to establish the point of social relationships remains insufficient. The main argument here is that in the unjust social milieu, the kind of social agreement essential to illocution is difficult. Moreover, what may look like a social agreement might be a result of the systemic oppression done to one particular group. In what follows, I claim that the problem of theorizing the social relation in illocutions remains unresolved.