Wave overtopping predictions using an advanced machine learning technique

被引:43
作者
den Bieman, Joost P. [1 ,2 ]
van Gent, Marcel R. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van den Boogaard, Henk F. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deltares, Dept Coastal Struct & Waves JdB & MvG, Boussinesqweg 1, NL-2629HV Delft, Netherlands
[2] Deltares Software Ctr HvdB, Boussinesqweg 1, NL-2629HV Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Hydraul Engn, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Machine learning; Wave overtopping; Coastal structures; Physical model tests; Gradient boosting decision trees; XGBoost;
D O I
10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103830
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Coastal structures are often designed to a maximum allowable wave overtopping discharge, hence accurate prediction of the amount of wave overtopping is an important issue. Both empirical formulae and neural networks are among the commonly used prediction tools. In this work, a new model for the prediction of mean wave overtopping discharge is presented using the innovative machine learning technique XGBoost. The selection of features to train the model on is carefully substantiated, including the redefinition of existing features to obtain a better model performance. Confidence intervals are derived by tuning hyperparameters and applying bootstrap resampling. The quality of the model is tested against four new physical model data sets, and a thorough quantitative comparison with existing machine learning methods and empirical overtopping formulae is presented. The XGBoost model generally outperforms other methods for the test data sets with normally incident waves. All data-driven methods show less accuracy on oblique wave data, presumably because these conditions are underrepresented in the training data. The performance of the XGBoost model is significantly improved by adding a randomly selected part of the new oblique wave cases to the training data. In the end, this new model is shown to reduce errors on all data used in this work with a factor of up to 5 compared to existing overtopping prediction methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Allsop N.W.H, 1993, 384 HR IT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, MANUAL WAVE OVERTOPP, VSecond
  • [3] Besley p, 2004, P 29 ICCE
  • [4] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [5] Burcharth H.F, P 31 ICCE
  • [6] Burg S, 2007, INVESTIGATIONS WAVE
  • [7] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [8] The influence of a berm and roughness on the wave overtopping at dikes
    Chen, W.
    van Gent, M. R. A.
    Warmink, J. J.
    Hulscher, S. J. M. H.
    [J]. COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 156
  • [9] Experimental Study on the Influence of Berms and Roughness on Wave Overtopping at Rock-Armoured Dikes
    Chen, Weiqiu
    Marconi, Alberto
    van Gent, Marcel R. A.
    Warmink, Jord J.
    Hulscher, Suzanne J. M. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (06) : 1 - 21
  • [10] Deltares, OV NEUR NETW WEBT