Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

被引:13
|
作者
Gong, Chongzhi [1 ]
Huang, Shengchan [1 ]
Song, Rentao [2 ]
Qi, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiplex gene editing; Cpf1; CRISPR/Cas; maize genetics; editing efficiency; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CPF1; ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASES; CLEAVAGE; BACTERIA; COMPLEX; RICE; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing therapies for cystic fibrosis
    Graham, Carina
    Hart, Stephen
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2021, 21 (06) : 767 - 780
  • [42] Analysis of microsatellite instability in CRISPR/Cas9 editing mice
    Huo, Xueyun
    Du, Yating
    Lu, Jing
    Guo, Meng
    Li, Zhenkun
    Zhang, Shuangyue
    Li, Xiaohong
    Chen, Zhenwen
    Du, Xiaoyan
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2017, 797 : 1 - 6
  • [43] Opportunities for CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Retinal Regeneration Research
    Campbell, Leah J.
    Hyde, David R.
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 5
  • [44] Visualization analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology studies
    Du, Quan-sheng
    Cui, Jie
    Zhang, Chun-jie
    He, Ke
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2016, 17 (10): : 798 - 806
  • [45] CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human zygotes using Cas9 protein
    Tang, Lichun
    Zeng, Yanting
    Du, Hongzi
    Gong, Mengmeng
    Peng, Jin
    Zhang, Buxi
    Lei, Ming
    Zhao, Fang
    Wang, Weihua
    Li, Xiaowei
    Liu, Jianqiao
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2017, 292 (03) : 525 - 533
  • [46] Delivery methods for CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in crustaceans
    Xu, Sen
    Pham, Thinh
    Neupane, Swatantra
    MARINE LIFE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 2 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [47] Efficient BoPDS Gene Editing in Cabbage by the CRISPR/Cas9 System
    Ma, Cunfa
    Liu, Mengci
    Li, Qinfei
    Si, Jun
    Ren, Xuesong
    Song, Hongyuan
    HORTICULTURAL PLANT JOURNAL, 2019, 5 (04) : 164 - 169
  • [48] Xenotransplantation: The Contribution of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Technology
    Zoe A. Stewart
    Current Transplantation Reports, 2022, 9 : 268 - 275
  • [49] CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat
    Dongjin Kim
    Burcu Alptekin
    Hikmet Budak
    Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2018, 18 : 31 - 41
  • [50] CRISPR/Cas9 or prime editing? - It depends on ...
    Schenke, Dirk
    OPEN LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (01): : 868 - 870