共 50 条
Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize
被引:13
|作者:
Gong, Chongzhi
[1
]
Huang, Shengchan
[1
]
Song, Rentao
[2
]
Qi, Weiwei
[1
]
机构:
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源:
AGRICULTURE-BASEL
|
2021年
/
11卷
/
05期
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
multiplex gene editing;
Cpf1;
CRISPR/Cas;
maize genetics;
editing efficiency;
GENOME;
CRISPR-CAS9;
CPF1;
ENDONUCLEASE;
NUCLEASES;
CLEAVAGE;
BACTERIA;
COMPLEX;
RICE;
RNAS;
D O I:
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号:
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号:
0901 ;
摘要:
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文