Comparative Study between the CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for Multiplex Gene Editing in Maize

被引:13
|
作者
Gong, Chongzhi [1 ]
Huang, Shengchan [1 ]
Song, Rentao [2 ]
Qi, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Life Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Bioenergy Crops, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr,Joint Int Res Lab Crop, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem,Beijing Key, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multiplex gene editing; Cpf1; CRISPR/Cas; maize genetics; editing efficiency; GENOME; CRISPR-CAS9; CPF1; ENDONUCLEASE; NUCLEASES; CLEAVAGE; BACTERIA; COMPLEX; RICE; RNAS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11050429
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has been proved to be an efficient multiplex gene editing system in maize, it was still unclear how CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) system would perform for multiplex gene editing in maize. To this end, this study compared the CRISPR/Cpf1 system and CRISPR/Cas9 system for multiplex gene editing in maize. The bZIP transcription factor Opaque2 (O2) was used as the target gene in both systems. We found that in the T0 and T1 generations, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system showed lower editing efficiency than the CRISPR/Cas9 system. However, in the T2 generation, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system generated more types of new mutations. While the CRISPR/Cas9 system tended to edit within the on-target range, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system preferred to edit in between the targets. We also found that in the CRISPR/Cpf1 system, the editing efficiency positively correlated with the expression level of Cpf1. In conclusion, the CRISPR/Cpf1 system offers alternative choices for target-site selection for multiplex gene editing and has acceptable editing efficiency in maize and is a valuable alternative choice for gene editing in crops.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient multiplex CRISPR/Cpf1 (Cas12a) genome editing system in Aspergillus aculeatus TBRC 277
    Abdulrachman, Dede
    Champreda, Verawat
    Eurwilaichitr, Lily
    Chantasingh, Duriya
    Pootanakit, Kusol
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 355 : 53 - 64
  • [2] Cas9 versus Cas12a/Cpf1: Structure-function comparisons and implications for genome editing
    Swarts, Daan C.
    Jinek, Martin
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA, 2018, 9 (05)
  • [3] Multiplex gene editing in rice with simplified CRISPR-Cpf1 and CRISPR-Cas9 systems
    Wang, Mugui
    Mao, Yanfei
    Lu, Yuming
    Wang, Zhidan
    Tao, Xiaoping
    Zhu, Jian-Kang
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2018, 60 (08) : 626 - 631
  • [4] CRISPR RNA Array-Guided Multisite Cleavage for Gene Disruption by Cas9 and Cpf1
    Wang, Dan
    Ma, Dejun
    Han, Jingxin
    Kong, Linghao
    Li, Lu-Yuan
    Xi, Zhen
    CHEMBIOCHEM, 2018, 19 (20) : 2195 - 2205
  • [5] The CRISPR Cas patent files, part 2: Is Cpf1/Cas12a a less conflict- prone alternative to Cas9?
    Storz, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 381 : 67 - 75
  • [6] Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize
    Lee, Keunsub
    Zhang, Yingxiao
    Kleinstiver, Benjamin P.
    Guo, Jimmy A.
    Aryee, Martin J.
    Miller, Jonah
    Malzahn, Aimee
    Zarecor, Scott
    Lawrence-Dill, Carolyn J.
    Joung, J. Keith
    Qi, Yiping
    Wang, Kan
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (02) : 362 - 372
  • [7] Target-dependent nickase activities of the CRISPR-Cas nucleases Cpf1 and Cas9
    Fu, Becky Xu Hua
    Smith, Justin D.
    Fuchs, Ryan T.
    Mabuchis, Megumu
    Curcuru, Jennifer
    Robb, G. Brett
    Fire, Andrew Z.
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (05) : 888 - 897
  • [8] Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing
    Tang, Xu
    Ren, Qiurong
    Yang, Lijia
    Bao, Yu
    Zhong, Zhaohui
    He, Yao
    Liu, Shishi
    Qi, Caiyan
    Liu, Binglin
    Wang, Yan
    Sretenovic, Simon
    Zhang, Yingxiao
    Zheng, Xuelian
    Zhang, Tao
    Qi, Yiping
    Zhang, Yong
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (07) : 1431 - 1445
  • [9] An efficient multiplex approach to CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus
    Sagawa, Cintia H. D.
    Thomson, Geoffrey
    Mermaz, Benoit
    Vernon, Corina
    Liu, Siqi
    Jacob, Yannick
    Irish, Vivian F.
    PLANT METHODS, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [10] A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants
    Xing, Hui-Li
    Dong, Li
    Wang, Zhi-Ping
    Zhang, Hai-Yan
    Han, Chun-Yan
    Liu, Bing
    Wang, Xue-Chen
    Chen, Qi-Jun
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2014, 14