Partisan Alignment Increases Voter Turnout: Evidence from Redistricting

被引:4
作者
Fraga, Bernard L. [1 ]
Moskowitz, Daniel J. [2 ]
Schneer, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 327 Tarbutton Hall,1555 Dickey Dr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Harris Sch Publ Policy, 1307 East 60th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Harvard Kennedy Sch, 79 JFK St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Redistricting; Partisanship; Voter turnout; Voter participation; US; MOBILIZATION; COMPETITION; CLOSENESS; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; CONSEQUENCES; POLARIZATION; DISTRICTS; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-021-09685-y
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Partisan gerrymandering and polarization have created an electoral landscape where Americans increasingly reside in congressional districts dominated by one party. Are individuals more likely to vote when their partisanship aligns with the partisan composition of the district? Leveraging nationwide voter file data and the redistricting process, we present causal evidence on this question via a longitudinal analysis of individual-level political participation. Tracking turnout before and after a redistricting cycle, where the boundaries of congressional districts change, we observe what happens when registrants experience a shock to the partisan composition of their district. We find turnout increases for individuals assigned to districts aligned with their partisanship as compared to individuals in misaligned districts, consistent with voters deriving expressive benefits from voting for the winning party. By demonstrating how districting influences political participation, our findings suggest a new implication of partisan gerrymandering that may clash with other democratic goals.
引用
收藏
页码:1883 / 1910
页数:28
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in US House elections [J].
Abramowitz, AI ;
Alexander, B ;
Gunning, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2006, 68 (01) :75-88
[2]   WHAT MAKES VOTERS TURN OUT: THE EFFECTS OF POLLS AND BELIEFS [J].
Agranov, Marina ;
Goeree, Jacob K. ;
Romero, Julian ;
Yariv, Leeat .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2018, 16 (03) :825-856
[3]  
Anderson CJ., 2005, LOSERS CONSENT ELECT
[4]   OF HORSESHOES AND HORSE RACES - EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE IMPACT OF POLL RESULTS ON ELECTORAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
ANSOLABEHERE, S ;
IYENGAR, S .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 1994, 11 (04) :413-430
[5]   Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Hersh, Eitan .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (04) :437-459
[6]   Everyone likes a winner: An empirical test of the effect of electoral closeness on turnout in a context of expressive voting [J].
Ashworth, John ;
Geys, Benny ;
Heyndels, Bruno .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2006, 128 (3-4) :383-405
[7]   Does advertising exposure affect turnout? [J].
Ashworth, Scott ;
Clinton, Joshua D. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (01) :27-41
[8]  
Barber M., 2014, Estimating neighborhood effects on turnout from geocoded voter registration records'
[9]   The mobilizing effect of majority-minority districts on Latino turnout [J].
Barreto, MA ;
Segura, GM ;
Woods, ND .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (01) :65-75
[10]  
Bartels Larry., 1988, Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice