Medium-Term (Least 5 Years) Comparative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 4SHG, Allograft, and LARS Ligament

被引:21
作者
Su, Mengdi [1 ,3 ]
Jia, Xinyu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Zaihang [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Zhigao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Qirong [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Sch Med, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Jiangbei Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE | 2021年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
autograft; allograft; LARS; ACL reconstruction; cumulative failure; return to sport; LONG-TERM; ARTIFICIAL LIGAMENT; GRAFT FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP; RETURN; SPORT; AUTOGRAFT; VALIDATION; CHINESE; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1097/JSM.0000000000000730
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon autograft (4SHG), allograft and the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) ligament, and to find the causes of cumulative failure or nonreturn to sport. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the second affiliated hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. Patients: Three hundred six patients with isolated ACL deficiency were included. Two hundred twenty-nine patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and finally, 185 of these patients participated in this study. Interventions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 4SHG, allograft, and LARS. Main Outcome Measures: Objective knee function, subjective knee function, and information regarding return to sport, cumulative failure, and complications. Secondary: distribution of tunnel position and tunnel enlargement. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups regarding all the clinical objective and subjective results, return to sport, complications, or cumulative failures (P > 0.05). One hundred twenty-eight patients (69.2%, 128/185) returned to sport. Preoperative (after injury) Tegner scores were inferior to postoperative Tegner scores, and postoperative Tegner scores were inferior to preinjury Tegner scores (P < 0.01). The femoral tunnel malposition was significantly associated with cumulative failure (P < 0.05). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences among the 4SHG, allograft, and LARS ligament in terms of the clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at 5-years follow-up. Interestingly, ACLR could improve the functional and motorial level of the knee, but patients had great difficulty in regaining the level of preinjury movement. In addition, the malposition of the femoral tunnel was an important cause of cumulative failure.
引用
收藏
页码:E101 / E110
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]   Autograft Versus Nonirradiated Allograft Tissue for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Systematic Review [J].
Mariscalco, Michael W. ;
Magnussen, Robert A. ;
Mehta, Divyesh ;
Hewett, Timothy E. ;
Flanigan, David C. ;
Kaeding, Christopher C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (02) :492-499
[42]   Femoral Tunnel Malposition in ACL Revision Reconstruction [J].
Morgan, Joseph A. ;
Dahm, Diane ;
Levy, Bruce ;
Stuart, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2012, 25 (05) :361-368
[43]   Serial evaluation of human anterior cruciate ligament grafts by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of allografts and autografts [J].
Muramatsu, Koichi ;
Hachiya, Yudo ;
Izawa, Hiroyuki .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (09) :1038-1044
[44]   Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system: a systematic review [J].
Newman, Simon D. S. ;
Atkinson, Henry D. E. ;
Willis-Owen, Charles A. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) :321-326
[45]   Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Pan X. ;
Wen H. ;
Wang L. ;
Ge T. .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013, 23 (7) :819-823
[46]   Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS™ artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years [J].
Parchi, Paolo Domenico ;
Gianluca, Ciapini ;
Dolfi, Lorenzo ;
Baluganti, Alessandro ;
Nicola, Piolanti ;
Chiellini, Fabio ;
Lisanti, Michele .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (08) :1567-1574
[47]  
Relph N, 2016, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V11, P536
[48]   Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Technique Overview and Comprehensive Review of Results [J].
Rue, Lieutenant Commander John Paul H. ;
Lewis, Paul B. ;
Parameswaran, A. Dushi ;
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A :67-74
[49]   Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study [J].
Sanders, Thomas L. ;
Kremers, Hilal Maradit ;
Bryan, Andrew J. ;
Larson, Dirk R. ;
Dahm, Diane L. ;
Levy, Bruce A. ;
Stuart, Michael J. ;
Krych, Aaron J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (06) :1502-1507
[50]   No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register [J].
Senorski, Eric Hamrin ;
Sundemo, David ;
Murawski, Christopher D. ;
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Fu, Freddie ;
Desai, Neel ;
Stalman, Anders ;
Samuelsson, Kristian .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (12) :3945-3954