Preservice Teachers' Conceptions and Enactments of Project-Based Instruction

被引:24
作者
Marshall, Jill A. [1 ]
Petrosino, Anthony J. [1 ]
Martin, Taylor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Project based instruction; Preservice teachers; Teacher preparation; Project based learning; INQUIRY; CURRICULUM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-010-9206-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We present results of an investigation of preservice secondary mathematics and science teachers' conceptions of project-based instruction (PBI) and their enactments of PBI in apprentice (student) teaching. We evaluated their thinking and implementations within a composite framework based on the work of education researchers. We analyzed survey responses, both qualitatively and statistically, from three cohorts of preservice teachers both before and after apprentice teaching. In addition we interviewed and observed a subset of these future teachers. We found that in general the preservice teachers held superficial views of PBI, as compared to the researcher framework. Participants reported time and curriculum restrictions as major barriers; however, teachers for whom enactment of PBI was presented as an explicit goal, and who were given support toward that end, were more likely to enact authentic implementations, regardless of previous reservations about PBI. Without this additional scaffolding, even teachers with high affinity for PBI were unlikely to implement it authentically.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 386
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Krajcik J., 1999, TEACHING CHILDREN SC
[12]  
Lehrer R, 2001, DESIGNING FOR SCIENCE, P251
[13]   WISE design for knowledge integration [J].
Linn, MC ;
Clark, D ;
Slotta, JD .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2003, 87 (04) :517-538
[14]  
Luft J., 2007, SCI TEACHER, V74, P24
[15]  
PETROSINO A, H MIFFLINS PROJECT B
[16]  
Polman J.L., 2000, Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry
[17]  
POLMAN JL, 2000, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[18]   Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases [J].
Prince, Michael J. ;
Felder, Richard M. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2006, 95 (02) :123-138
[19]   Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform [J].
Singer, J ;
Marx, RW ;
Krajcik, J ;
Chambers, JC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 35 (03) :165-178
[20]   Guest editorial: The future of science teacher preparation in America: Where is the evidence to inform program design and guide responsible policy decisions? [J].
Windschitl, M .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2005, 89 (04) :525-534