Multi-level port resilience planning in the UK: How can information sharing be made easier?

被引:49
作者
Shaw, Duncan R. [1 ]
Grainger, Andrew [1 ]
Achuthan, Kamal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] UCL, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, Ctr Transport Studies, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Complex system; Port resilience planning; Information sharing; Operational context; Policy context; DISASTER RESILIENCE; PRIVACY RESEARCH; DOMINANT LOGIC; VALUE CREATION; INTEROPERABILITY; STRATEGY; SYSTEMS; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.065
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Port resilience planning is a subset of the wider disaster resilience literature and it is concerned with how port stakeholders work together to make port systems more resilience. Port stakeholders include government departments, the port operator, ship operators, importers, agents and logistics firms. Ports are vital for the operation of cities and whole countries, especial island nations like the UK. Single port systems are multi-level systems with complex operational-level relationships and interdependencies. Additional levels to this include government and the policy-level. Preparing for the crises and disasters that might befall ports requires information sharing between stakeholders about key dependencies and alternative actions. The complexity of ports presents barriers to information sharing; as do commercial and political sensitivities. This paper uses a multi-level case study on the UK's system of ports to propose an approach to information sharing that uses the subjectivity of information from a supplier's perspective and from a user's perspective to reduce barriers of complexity, confidentiality and political sensitivity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [31] THE CASE RESEARCH STRATEGY IN STUDIES OF INFORMATION-SYSTEMS
    BENBASAT, I
    GOLDSTEIN, DK
    MEAD, M
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 1987, 11 (03) : 369 - 386
  • [32] Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions
    Bhamra, Ran
    Dani, Samir
    Burnard, Kevin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) : 5375 - 5393
  • [33] Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises
    Bharosa, Nitesh
    Lee, JinKyu
    Janssen, Marijn
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2010, 12 (01) : 49 - 65
  • [34] Hermeneutics, information and representation
    Chalmers, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2004, 13 (03) : 210 - 220
  • [35] Emergency response information system interoperability: Development of chemical incident response data model
    Chen, Rui
    Rao, H. Raghav
    Sharman, Raj
    Upadhyaya, Shambhu J.
    Chakravarti, Nirupama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 9 (3-4): : 200 - 230
  • [36] Organizational Resilience and Using Information and Communication Technologies to Rebuild Communication Structures
    Chewning, Lisa V.
    Lai, Chih-Hui
    Doerfel, Marya L.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2013, 27 (02) : 237 - 263
  • [37] COMFORT LK., 2001, Journal of contingencies and crisis management, V9, P144, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.00164
  • [38] Crichton M.T., 2009, Journal of Contingencies Crisis Management, V17, P24, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2009.00556.X, 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00556.x]
  • [39] PROCESS MODELING
    CURTIS, B
    KELLNER, MI
    OVER, J
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1992, 35 (09) : 75 - 90
  • [40] Dhanaraj C, 2006, ACAD MANAGE REV, V31, P659, DOI [10.5465/AMR.2006.21318923, 10.2307/20159234]