Data processing within rows for sugarcane yield mapping

被引:5
作者
Maldaner, Leonardo Felipe [1 ]
Molin, Jose Paulo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo ESALQ, Lab Agr Precisao, Dept Engn Biossistemas, Ave Padua Dias 11, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
yield monitor; sugarcane variability; line maps; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1590/1678-992X-2018-0391
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The mapping of sugarcane yield is still not as widely available as it is for grain crops. Sugarcane harvesters cut and process the cane in a single or maximum of two rows, facilitating the monitoring of cane yield and its behavior on a small scale. This study tested a method for sugarcane yield data cleaning, investigating if the data recording frequency influences the characterization of yield variations in mapping high-resolution spatial data within a single row. Four data sets from yield monitors of single row harvesting were used. A cleaning process with global and anisotropic filtering in a single sugarcane row was applied. The local outlier cleaner compares the yield value of a point with its nearest neighbors within the same row. Even after the elimination of outliers, there is great variation in yield between the rows, and this variation is much smaller in a single row. A frequency of 2 Hz was required for identifying and characterizing small yield variations within the sugarcane rows whilst other frequencies tried (0.2 and 0.1 Hz) resulted in loss of information on yield variability within the row. The difference between the root mean square error (RMSE) of ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW) techniques is large enough to suggest the use of an individual yield line. Individual yield lines saved information in the data generated by the yield monitor unlike IDW and OK interpolation methods which omitted information over short distances within the rows and compromised the quality of high-resolution maps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Canopy sensor placement for variable-rate nitrogen application in sugarcane fields [J].
Amaral, Lucas R. ;
Trevisan, Rodrigo G. ;
Molin, Jose P. .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2018, 19 (01) :147-160
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, QGIS Geographic Information System
[3]  
Blackmore Simon, 1999, Precision Agriculture, V1, P53
[4]   FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS [J].
CAMBARDELLA, CA ;
MOORMAN, TB ;
NOVAK, JM ;
PARKIN, TB ;
KARLEN, DL ;
TURCO, RF ;
KONOPKA, AE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (05) :1501-1511
[5]   A computational environment to support research in sugarcane agriculture [J].
Driemeier, Carlos ;
Ling, Liu Yi ;
Sanches, Guilherme M. ;
Pontes, Angelica O. ;
Graziano Magalhaes, Paulo S. ;
Ferreira, Joao E. .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2016, 130 :13-19
[6]   Sugarcane yield prediction in Brazil using NDVI time series and neural networks ensemble [J].
Fernandes, Jeferson Lobato ;
Favilla Ebecken, Nelson Francisco ;
Dalla Mora Esquerdo, Julio Cesar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (16) :4631-4644
[7]  
Griffin T. W., 2018, Precision agriculture basics, P221
[8]  
Isaaks E.H., 1989, Applied Geostatistics
[9]  
Jensen TA, 2013, INT SUGAR J, V115, P53
[10]  
Jin J, 2010, T ASABE, V53, P283