Scored out of 10: Experiences with Binary Grading Across the Curriculum

被引:21
作者
Berns, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614 USA
来源
SIGCSE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION | 2020年
关键词
student assessment; grading techniques; course administration;
D O I
10.1145/3328778.3366956
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Perhaps no other task has frustrated us as instructors as much as grading. While we recognize the importance of providing meaningful feedback and accurate assessment, our traditional grading had quickly become a task of administrative minutiae instead of helpful coaching. Like many faculty, we have searched for ways to reduce our grading load without harming student learning. We have tried a variety of approaches, from modifying our existing assignments all the way to rethinking our entire course design. The past few years we have been refining a binary grading system: a set of grading principles based upon the practice of scoring student assessments simply as either satisfactory or unsatisfactory (10(2) possible scores, thus the paper title). We believe this approach has significantly improved our students' attitudes towards our courses and holds promise as a way to significantly reduce the time we spend grading. In this paper, we describe our experiences with our binary grading system in several undergraduate computer science courses. We discuss the general practices of our binary grading, how we have implemented it in our courses, and what our experiences have taught us regarding the future refinement of our grading practices. We hope our experiences will spur discussion and assist other computer science educators in improving their assessment process.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1157
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Bailie F., 2010, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, V25, P15
[2]  
Feldman J., 2018, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms
[3]  
Ferguson H., 2013, Counterpoints, V451, P194
[4]   ON ALGOL EDUCATION - AUTOMATIC GRADING PROGRAMS [J].
FORSYTHE, GE ;
WIRTH, N .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1965, 8 (05) :275-&
[5]  
GitLab Inc, 2019, GITLAB
[6]  
McGufee James W., 2019, P 50 ACM TECHN S COM, P1234, DOI [10.1145/3287324.3287528, DOI 10.1145/3287324.3287528]
[7]  
Nilson L.B., 2015, Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time
[8]  
Roberson Christian, 2018, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, V33, P192
[9]  
Rodger Susan H., 2006, JFLAP: An Interactive Formal Languages and Automata Package