Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve

被引:172
作者
Casati, A. [1 ]
Baciarello, M. [1 ]
Di Cianni, S. [1 ]
Danelli, G. [1 ]
De Marco, G. [1 ]
Leone, S. [1 ]
Rossi, M. [1 ]
Fanelli, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Osped Maggiore Parma, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
anaesthetic techniques; regional; femoral nerve block; anaesthetics local; ropivacaine; equipment; nerve stimulator; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aem100
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance may reduce the minimum effective anaesthetic volume (MEAV(50)) of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve compared with nerve stimulation guidance. Methods. After standard premedication and sciatic nerve block were given, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive a femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.5% using either nerve stimulation (group NS, n=30) or ultrasound (group US, n=30) guidance. The volume of the injected solution was varied for consecutive patients based on an up-and-down staircase method according to the response of the previous patient. The initial volume was 12 ml. A double-blinded observer evaluated the occurrence of complete loss of pinprick sensation in the femoral nerve distribution, with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle: positive or negative responses within 30 min after the injection determined a 3 ml decrease or increase for the next patient, respectively. Results. The mean (SD) MEAV(50) for femoral nerve block was 15 (4) ml (95% CI, 7-23 ml) in group US and 26 (4) ml (95% CI, 19-33 ml) in group NS (P=0.002). The effective dose in 95% of cases (ED95) calculated with probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 22 ml (95% CI, 13-36 ml) in group US, and 41 ml (95% CI, fs 24-66 ml) in group NS. Conclusions. Ultrasound guidance provided a 42% reduction in the MEAV of ropivacaine 0.5% required to block the femoral nerve as compared with the nerve stimulation guidance.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 827
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DESIGNING CLIN RES
[2]   Major complications of regional anesthesia in France - The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service [J].
Auroy, Y ;
Benhamou, D ;
Bargues, L ;
Ecoffey, C ;
Falissard, B ;
Mercier, F ;
Bouaziz, H ;
Samii, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (05) :1274-1280
[3]  
Casati A, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V93, P183
[4]  
Casati A, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P205
[5]   Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Chan, VWS ;
Perlas, A ;
Rawson, R ;
Odukoya, O .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) :1514-1517
[6]  
DALENS B, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V69, P852
[7]   Location, location, location! Ultrasound imaging in regional anaesthesia [J].
Denny, NA ;
Harrop-Griffiths, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (01) :1-3
[8]   STAIRCASE BIOASSAY - THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD [J].
DIXON, WJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1991, 15 (01) :47-50
[9]   Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: Failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications [J].
Fanelli, G ;
Casati, A ;
Garancini, P ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :847-852
[10]   Ultrasonography in the current practice of regional anaesthesia [J].
Grau, Thomas .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :175-200