Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights into patients thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos

被引:86
作者
de Lacey, Sheryl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Res Ctr Reprod Hlth, Discipline Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
IVF; frozen embryo; embryo donation; pregnancy termination; embryo destruction;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dem056
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In the final decision for the disposition of unused IVF embryos patients must choose between options involving either donation or destruction, and this decision must be made in a context where there is tension about the status of embryos (i.e. whether viewed as potential children or as a base for further development) and whether embryo donation is adoption or tissue donation. This study explored the emotive experience of making a decision for either the destruction or donation of unused embryos. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (9 women and 12 couples) who discarded embryos and 15 (7 women and 4 couples) who donated embryos were interviewed. Interview data were analysed with particular attention to elements of moral deliberation and use of analogy. RESULTS: Adoption and tissue donation metaphors were both identified, and further, a metaphor of pregnancy termination was identified and found to be highly influential in the decision to donate embryos. Contrary to the majority of current evidence, this study found that participants who discarded embryos emphasized the adoption metaphor while embryo donors emphasized the metaphor of pregnancy termination. For each group the decision was driven by awareness of the option they did not want. CONCLUSIONS: The pregnancy termination metaphor emerged as morally relevant and this holds implications for defining and discussing embryo discard in counselling and consent processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1758
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
CAPLAN A, 2003, PROBLEM EMBRYO ADOPT
[2]   Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos [J].
de Lacey, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) :1661-1669
[3]   What should we do with donated embryos that may be genetically affected? [J].
de Lacey, S ;
Norman, RJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (05) :1065-1068
[4]   Firing up the nature/nurture controversy:: bioethics and genetic determinism [J].
de Melo-Martín, I .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (09) :526-530
[5]   Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour [J].
Dickenson, DL .
BIOETHICS, 2001, 15 (03) :205-217
[6]  
*FERT SOC AUSTR, 2002, REPR TECHN ACCR COMM
[7]  
Glaser B., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
[8]  
Gluck ShermaBerger., 1991, WOMENS WORDS FEMINIS
[9]   Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research [J].
Hoffman, DI ;
Zellman, GL ;
Fair, CC ;
Mayer, JF ;
Zeitz, JG ;
Gibbons, WE ;
Turner, TG .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) :1063-1069
[10]  
Holloway I., 2005, QUALITATIVE RES HLTH