Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review)

被引:489
作者
Legare, France [1 ]
Adekpedjou, Rheda [2 ]
Stacey, Dawn [3 ]
Turcotte, Stephane [4 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [5 ]
Graham, Ian D. [6 ]
Lyddiatt, Anne
Politi, Mary C. [7 ]
Thomson, Richard [8 ]
Elwyn, Glyn [9 ]
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Ctr Rech Soins & Serv Premiere Ligne Univ Laval C, 2525 Chemin Canardiere, Quebec City, PQ G1J 0A4, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Hop St Francois Assise, CHU Quebec CRCHUQ, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Nursing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol Publ Hlth & Preventat Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[8] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[9] Cardiff Univ, Cochrane Inst Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[10] Univ Marburg, Dept Family Med Gen Practice, Marburg, Germany
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2018年 / 07期
关键词
Decision Making; *Decision Support Techniques; *Patient Participation; Health Personnel [*education; Patient Education as Topic [methods; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Humans; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RISK COMMUNICATION AIDS; PROSTATE-CANCER; PATIENT ACTIVATION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; HYPERTENSION CONTROL; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. Selection criteria Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures. Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Main results We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains. Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105). It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL. Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95% C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-relatedQOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs. Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.19; 2 studies; N = 266); improve physical (SMD 0.08, -0.37 to 0.54; 1 study; N = 75) or mental health-related QOL (SMD 0.01, -0.44 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 75), affect consultation length (SMD 3.72, 95% CI 3.44 to 4.01; 1 study; N = 36) or costs (no data available) and may make little or no difference to decision regret (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.33; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.29, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.60; 1 study; N = 20); (RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.04; 1 study; N = 134) or reported by patients (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.32; 1 study; N = 150) as the certainty of the evidence was very low. There was insuffient information to determine the effects on decision regret, physical or mental health-related quality of life, or consultation length or costs. Authors' conclusions It is uncertain whether any interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals are effective because the certainty of the evidence is low or very low.
引用
收藏
页数:486
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]   Time-to-event versus ten-year-absolute-risk in cardiovascular risk prevention - does it make a difference? Results from the Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized-controlled trial [J].
Adarkwah, Charles Christian ;
Jegan, Nikita ;
Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika ;
Kuhne, Felicitas ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Popert, Uwe ;
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert ;
Kurwitz, Sarah .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 16
[2]  
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (U.S.), 2013, DEVELOPING PROTOCOL
[3]   A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents' communication with patients at the end of life [J].
Alexander, Stewart C. ;
Keitz, Sheri A. ;
Sloane, Richard ;
Tulsky, James A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (11) :1008-1012
[4]   Impact of pharmacist intervention on adherence and measurable patient outcomes among depressed patients: a randomised controlled study [J].
Aljumah, K. ;
Hassali, M. A. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 15
[5]   A Computer-Tailored Intervention to Promote Informed Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among African American Men [J].
Allen, Jennifer D. ;
Mohllajee, Anshu P. ;
Shelton, Rachel C. ;
Drake, Bettina F. ;
Mars, Dana R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2009, 3 (04) :340-351
[6]   Impact of National Institutes of Health Gastrointestinal PROMIS Measures in Clinical Practice: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial [J].
Almario, Christopher V. ;
Chey, William D. ;
Khanna, Dinesh ;
Mosadeghi, Sasan ;
Ahmed, Shahzad ;
Afghani, Elham ;
Whitman, Cynthia ;
Fuller, Garth ;
Reid, Mark ;
Bolus, Roger ;
Dennis, Buddy ;
Encarnacion, Rey ;
Martinez, Bibiana ;
Soares, Jennifer ;
Modi, Rushaba ;
Agarwal, Nikhil ;
Lee, Aaron ;
Kubomoto, Scott ;
Sharma, Gobind ;
Bolus, Sally ;
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (11) :1546-1556
[7]  
Alston C., 2012, Discussion Paper
[8]   Transforming the Patient Role to Achieve Better Outcomes Through a Patient Empowerment Program: A Randomized Wait-List Control Trial Protocol [J].
Altshuler, Lisa ;
Plaksin, Joseph ;
Zabar, Sondra ;
Wallach, Andrew ;
Sawicki, Chester ;
Kundrod, Sarita ;
Kalet, Adina .
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2016, 5 (02)
[9]   Advance care planning for nursing home residents with dementia: Influence of 'we DECide' on policy and practice [J].
Ampe, Sophie ;
Sevenants, Aline ;
Smets, Tinne ;
Declercq, Anja ;
Van Audenhove, Chantal .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (01) :139-146
[10]   GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength [J].
Andrews, Jeffrey C. ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Pottie, Kevin ;
Meerpohl, Joerg J. ;
Coello, Pablo Alonso ;
Rind, David ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Brito, Juan Pablo ;
Norris, Susan ;
Elbarbary, Mahmoud ;
Post, Piet ;
Nasser, Mona ;
Shukla, Vijay ;
Jaeschke, Roman ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Djulbegovic, Ben ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (07) :726-735