Managing autonomy in university-industry research: a case of collaborative Ph.D. projects in the Netherlands

被引:8
作者
Zalewska-Kurek, Kasia [1 ]
Harms, Rainer [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Elect Engn Comp Sci & Math, Creat Technol, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dutch Inst Knowledge Intens Entrepreneurship, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econd, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Collaborative research; Management research; University-industry partnerships; Interdependence; Autonomy; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ACTIVITIES; FIRMS; ALLIANCES; SUCCESS; ENTREPRENEURIAL; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11846-019-00361-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research partnerships between university researchers and industry partners are becoming increasingly prevalent. For university researchers, maintaining autonomy is crucial. We explore how researchers strategically manage autonomy in collaborative research partnerships, using a framework to distinguish strategically planned and opportunity-driven behaviour in the process of selecting partners and executing research in partnerships. We then focus on the management of autonomy in setting research directions and managing the research process. We draw on insights from 14 management scholars engaged in collaborative Ph.D. research projects. Based on our analysis, we show that researcher autonomy has two facets: operational and scientific. Researchers are willing to compromise their operational autonomy as a price for industry collaboration. They have a strong need for scientific autonomy when deciding on research direction and research execution. Although they need funding, entering a specific relationship with industry and accepting restrictions on their operational autonomy is a choice. We conclude that researchers' orientations towards practice and theory affects their choices in partnerships as well as modes of governance.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 416
页数:24
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   Scientific research groups' cooperation with firms and government agencies: motivations and barriers [J].
Ramos-Vielba, Irene ;
Sanchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel ;
Woolley, Richard .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (03) :558-585
[32]   Governance mode choice in collaborative Ph.D. projects [J].
Salimi, Negin ;
Bekkers, Rudi ;
Frenken, Koen .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2015, 40 (05) :840-858
[33]   How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects [J].
Steinmo, Marianne ;
Rasmussen, Einar .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (03) :1250-1259
[34]  
Stokes D. E., 1997, Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation
[35]   The paradox of autonomy: A case of academic research scientists [J].
Trevelyan, R .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2001, 54 (04) :495-525
[36]   Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? [J].
Van Looy, B ;
Ranga, M ;
Callaert, J ;
Debackere, K ;
Zimmermann, E .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (03) :425-441
[37]   Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting [J].
Wilts, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (06) :767-781
[38]   Knowledge transfer activities of scientists in nanotechnology [J].
Zalewska-Kurek, Kasia ;
Egedova, Klaudia ;
Geurts, Peter A. Th. M. ;
Roosendaal, Hans E. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2018, 43 (01) :139-158
[40]  
Zalewska-Kurek K, 2010, RES EVALUAT, V19, P217, DOI 10.3152/095820210X503474