Critical assessment of rapid methods to qualify supplementary cementitious materials for use in concrete

被引:38
作者
Al-Shmaisani, Saif [1 ]
Kalina, Ryan D. [1 ]
Ferron, Raissa Douglas [1 ]
Juenger, Maria C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 301 E Dean Keeton St C1748, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Reactivity testing; Supplementary cementitious materials; Resistivity; Isothermal calorimetry; Lime strength; BIOMASS FLY-ASH; COAL BOTTOM ASH; SILICA FUME; WASTE GLASS; STRENGTH; REACTIVITY; HYDRATION; PERFORMANCE; FILLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106709
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, several tests for supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) were evaluated to find the best methods to rapidly screen out inert materials, measure overall reactivity, and differentiate between pozzolanicity and latent hydraulicity. The R-3 matrix and lime reactivity tests were found to be the most effective at quickly screening out inert materials. However, slow-reacting materials may appear to have low reactivity in both tests and extending the test duration better depicts material reactivity. Additionally, SCMs with higher alumina content perform better in the R-3 tests due to the higher heat release and more bound water associated with the formation of calcium aluminate hydrates compared to calcium silicate hydrates, creating reactivity bias when compared to SCMs with lower alumina content. Measuring the calcium hydroxide content of R-3 pastes, through thermogravimetric analysis or single point mass loss, can also differentiate between pozzolanic and hydraulic materials.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 110 条
[21]  
[Anonymous], 2013, A3004E1 CSA
[22]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CT18 ACI
[23]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASTM E2058-13a Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Material Flammability Using a Fire Propagation Apparatus (FPA), Vi, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1520/C0150, 10.1520/D3385-09.responsibility, DOI 10.1520/D3385-09.RESPONSIBILITY, 10.1520/C0039, DOI 10.1520/C0039]
[24]  
[Anonymous], 2017, C778 ASTM, DOI [10.1520/C0778-17.2, DOI 10.1520/C0778-17.2]
[25]   Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone [J].
Antoni, M. ;
Rossen, J. ;
Martirena, F. ;
Scrivener, K. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2012, 42 (12) :1579-1589
[26]   Use of ground coal bottom ash as cement constituent in concretes exposed to chloride environments [J].
Argiz, Cristina ;
Moragues, Amparo ;
Menendez, Esperanza .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 170 :25-33
[27]   Use of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash in concrete [J].
Aubert, JE ;
Husson, B ;
Vaquier, A .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (06) :957-963
[28]   Critical evaluation of strength prediction methods for alkali-activated fly ash [J].
Aughenbaugh, K. L. ;
Williamson, T. ;
Juenger, M. C. G. .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 48 (03) :607-620
[29]   Identifying Glass Compositions in Fly Ash [J].
Aughenbaugh, Katherine L. ;
Stutzman, Paul ;
Juenger, Maria C. G. .
FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2016, 3
[30]   An examination of the reactivity of fly ash in cementitious pore solutions [J].
Aughenbaugh, Katherine L. ;
Chancey, Ryan T. ;
Stutzman, Paul ;
Juenger, Maria C. ;
Fowler, David W. .
MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 46 (05) :869-880