Government R&D investment decision-making in the energy sector: LCOE foresight model reveals what regression analysis cannot

被引:24
作者
Lee, Jungwoo [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Jae-Suk [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Future Strategy, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Energy Technol Evaluat & Planning, Ctr R&D Technol Policy, Seoul 06175, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
R&D assessment; Government R&D; LCOE foresight; R&D decision-making; R&D investment; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER-GENERATION; MARKET FAILURES; LEARNING RATES; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; CURVES; GROWTH; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2018.04.003
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
For governments that prioritize R&D investment, future decision-making depends on performance-based budgeting. Governments evaluate outputs and outcomes of R&D programs regularly and budget for next year on the basis of program assessment. However, existing assessment methodology disregards long-term technology development; in sectors such as the energy sector, it takes a long time for technologies to progress from R&D to commercialization. This paper is a comparative analysis of existing R&D assessment models and the new foresight model developed from the point of view of government. A regression analysis is conducted using probit and ordinary least squares (OLS) models to analyze the performance of projects completed based on past R&D investment. The foresight model, which is based on the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), is discussed in comparison. Results of the regression analysis show that government investment in market expansion of renewable energy technologies is minimal in Korea. In contrast, the LCOE foresight model results show that renewable energy technologies are appropriate targets for government R&D investment. The foresight model should be utilized for government R&D decision-making in the energy sector because it brings to light hidden information, including learning rates and technology dynamics, which remains unaddressed when analyzing using existing R&D assessment models.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (04) :625-648
[2]  
Alberth S., 2007, ENERGY, P1, DOI [10.17863/CAM.5166, DOI 10.17863/CAM.5166]
[3]  
American Energy Innovation Council, 2015, REST AM EN INN LEAD
[4]  
American Energy Innovation Council, 2011, CAT AM ING ROL GOVT, V44
[5]   Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios [J].
Anandarajah, Gabrial ;
McDowall, Will ;
Ekins, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (08) :3419-3432
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROJ COST GEN EL
[7]  
[Anonymous], TOOLK EV PUBL R D IN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REN POW GEN COSTS 20
[9]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[10]   Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance [J].
Berchicci, Luca .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :117-127