Determination of Breast Cancer Response to Bevacizumab Therapy Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Artificial Neural Networks

被引:46
作者
Hoyt, Kenneth [1 ,2 ]
Warram, Jason M.
Umphrey, Heidi
Belt, Lin
Lockhart, Mark E.
Robbin, Michelle L.
Zinn, Kurt R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bevacizumab; breast cancer; contrast agent; neural networks; ultrasound; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITOR; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; BLOOD-FLOW; VASCULATURE; DESTRUCTION; XENOGRAFTS; PARAMETERS; AGENTS;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2010.29.4.577
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound and neural network data classification for determining the breast cancer response to bevacizumab therapy in a murine model. Methods. An ultrasound scanner operating in the harmonic mode was used to measure ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) time-intensity curves in vivo. Twenty-five nude athymic mice with orthotopic breast cancers received a 30-mu L tail vein bolus of a perflutren microsphere UCA, and baseline tumor imaging was performed using microbubble destruction-replenishment techniques. Subsequently, 15 animals received a 0.2-mg injection of bevacizumab, whereas 10 control animals received an equivalent dose of saline. Animals were reimaged on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 before euthanasia. Histologic assessment of excised tumor sections was performed. Time-intensity curve analysis for a given region of interest was conducted using customized software. Tumor perfusion metrics on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 were modeled using neural network data classification schemes (60% learning and 40% testing) to predict the breast cancer response to therapy. Results. The breast cancer response to a single dose of bevacizumab in a murine model was immediate and transient. Permutations of input to the neural network data classification scheme revealed that tumor perfusion data within 3 days of bevacizumab dosing was sufficient to minimize the prediction error to 10%, whereas measurements of physical tumor size alone did not appear adequate to assess the therapeutic response. Conclusions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a useful tool for determining the response to bevacizumab therapy and monitoring the subsequent restoration of blood flow to breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 585
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Maximizing the potential of bevacizumab in cancer treatment [J].
Bergsland, E ;
Dickler, MN .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 :36-42
[2]   Future use of bevacizumab and other anti-angiogenic agents in breast cancer [J].
Cameron, David ;
Bell, Richard .
EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (06) :40-50
[3]   Expanding the clinical development of bevacizumab [J].
Chen, HX .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 :27-35
[4]   Contrast-enhanced US of microcirculation of superficially implanted tumors in rats [J].
Chomas, JE ;
Pollard, RE ;
Sadlowski, AR ;
Griffey, SM ;
Wisner, ER ;
Ferrara, KW .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :439-446
[5]  
de Jong N., 1996, IEEE ULTRASONICS S, V1, P1449
[6]   Revacizumab-induced transient remodeling of the vasculature in neuroblastoma xenografts results in improved delivery and efficacy of systemically administered chemotherapy [J].
Dickson, Paxton V. ;
Hamner, John B. ;
Sims, Thomas L. ;
Fraga, Charles H. ;
Ng, Catherine Y. C. ;
Rajasekeran, Surender ;
Hagedorn, Nikolaus L. ;
McCarville, M. Beth ;
Stewart, Clinton F. ;
Davidoff, Andrew M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (13) :3942-3950
[7]   Novel artificial neural network for early detection of prostate cancer [J].
Djavan, B ;
Remzi, M ;
Zlotta, A ;
Seitz, C ;
Snow, P ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (04) :921-929
[8]   Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power [J].
Eckersley, RJ ;
Chin, CT ;
Burns, PN .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 31 (02) :213-219
[9]   Pathways Mediating Resistance to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor - Targeted Therapy [J].
Ellis, Lee M. ;
Hicklin, Daniel J. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (20) :6371-6375
[10]  
FLOYD CE, 1994, CANCER, V74, P2944, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941201)74:11<2944::AID-CNCR2820741109>3.0.CO