Implanon as a contraceptive choice for teenage mothers: a comparison of contraceptive choices, acceptability and repeat pregnancy

被引:64
作者
Lewis, Lucy N. [1 ,2 ]
Doherty, Dorota A. [2 ]
Hickey, Martha [2 ]
Skinner, S. Rachel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Paediat & Child Hlth, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Womens & Infants Hlth, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Discipline Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
Repeat teenage pregnancy; Postpartum contraception; Implanon; LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS; OUTCOMES; INTENTIONS; EFFICACY; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: This study was conducted to compare the incidence of repeat teenage pregnancy over a 24-month period postpartum among users of Implanon, the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and barrier methods or nothing (barrier/none). Contraceptive continuation rates 24 months postpartum for Implanon and COCP/DMPA were also compared. Study Design: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Comparison groups were postpartum teenagers (12-18 years old) who self-selected Implanon (n=73), COCP/DMPA (n=40) and barrier/none (n=24). Questionnaires were used to gather data at recruitment and postpartum at 6 weeks and then 3 monthly intervals for 2 years. Results: At 24 months postpartum, 48 (35%) teenagers had conceived. Implanon users became pregnant later than other contraceptive groups (p=.022), with mean time to first repeat pregnancy of 23.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.2-25.5], compared to 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.1-20.7) for COCP/DMPA and 17.6 months (95% Cl, 14.0-21.3) for barrier/none. Implanon users were more likely to continue their use at 24 months than COCP/DMPA (p<.001) users. The mean duration for Implanon users was 18.7 months (95% CI, 17.0-20.3) compared to 11.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-14.3) for COCP/DMPA. Conclusion: Teenagers who choose Implanon are significantly less likely to become pregnant and were found to continue with this method of contraception 24 months postpartum compared to those who choose COCP or DMPA and barrier methods or nothing. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 426
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abma Joyce C, 2004, Vital Health Stat 23, P1
[2]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006, 20390 ABS
[3]   Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behavious among adolescent women: A coital event level analysis [J].
Bartz, Deborah ;
Shew, Marcia ;
Ofner, Susan ;
Fortenberry, J. Dennis .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2007, 41 (03) :271-276
[4]  
Bennink H J, 2000, Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, V5 Suppl 2, P12
[5]   Delaying second births among adolescent mothers: A randomized, controlled trial of a home-based mentoring program [J].
Black, Maureen M. ;
Bentley, Margaret E. ;
Papas, Mia A. ;
Oberlander, Sarah ;
Teti, Laureen O. ;
McNary, Scot ;
Le, Katherine ;
O'Connell, Melissa .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 118 (04) :E1087-E1099
[6]  
Boardman LA., 2006, J Adolesc Health, V39, p597.
[7]   Trends in birth rates for teenagers in Queensland, 1988 to 1997: an analysis by economic disadvantage and geographic remoteness [J].
Coory, M .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 24 (03) :316-319
[8]  
*DEP CHILDR SCH FA, 2007, ANN REP 2007 08 DEP
[9]   Hawaii's healthy start home visiting program: Determinants and impact of rapid repeat birth [J].
El-Kamary, SS ;
Higman, SM ;
Fuddy, L ;
McFarlane, E ;
Sia, C ;
Duggan, AK .
PEDIATRICS, 2004, 114 (03) :E317-E326
[10]   Adolescent pregnancy [J].
Elfenbein, DS ;
Felice, ME .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 50 (04) :781-+