Disentangling the effects of compositional and structural diversity on forest productivity

被引:62
作者
Pedro, Mariana Silva [1 ]
Rammer, Werner [1 ]
Seidl, Rupert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Forest & Soil Sci, Inst Silviculture, Peter Jordan Str 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Ecosystem functioning; Forest productivity; Forest successional development; iLand model; Net primary production; Structural diversity; Tree species diversity; SPECIES RICHNESS; FAGUS-SYLVATICA; CARBON DENSITY; QUERCUS-ROBUR; BIODIVERSITY; TEMPERATE; STANDS; MODEL; ECOSYSTEMS; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1111/jvs.12505
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Questions Tree species diversity is widely reported to positively influence forest productivity. Yet, a consistent attribution of productivity effects is complicated by the fact that compositional and structural diversity are often related in forest ecosystems. Here, our objective was to disentangle the effects of diversity in species and structures on forest productivity. We further assessed whether the influence of structure and composition on productivity changes over the course of forest development. Location Hainich National Park, central Germany. Methods We conducted a factorial simulation experiment in which 63 unique combinations of six different tree species were studied over 500yr of forest development. The model used was iLand, a process-based simulator operating at individual tree resolution. The indicators of compositional diversity considered included species richness, entropy, evenness and identity, while structural diversity was characterized by indicators describing vertical and horizontal stand structure. Net primary production (NPP) was studied as the response variable, and random forest analysis was used to synthesize simulation output. Results We found positive effects of both compositional and structural diversity on productivity, but their influence changed distinctly over the course of forest development. In early-seral stages, diversity effects on NPP were dominated by aspects of tree species composition, and displayed a strong positive selection effect for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). In later stages of forest development, diversity effects on NPP were dominated by structural diversity, with productivity increasing with increased variation in tree diameter and canopy complexity. Conclusion To better understand the effects of diversity on ecosystem functioning, both the compositional and structural dimensions of diversity in forest ecosystems (and their changes over time) need to be considered. In the context of ecosystem management our results suggest that the reduction in productivity associated with the loss of a canopy tree species (e.g. due to the invasion of an alien pest species) can to some degree be compensated through increased structural diversity. Fostering both compositional and structural diversity are important means to increase the robustness of forest ecosystem functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 658
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Aerts Raf, 2011, BMC Ecology, V11, P29, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-11-29
[2]   Comparative study of additive basal area of conifers in forest ecosystems along elevational gradients [J].
Aiba, Shin-ichiro ;
Hanya, Goro ;
Tsujino, Riyou ;
Takyu, Masaaki ;
Seino, Tatsuyuki ;
Kimura, Katsuhiko ;
Kitayama, Kanehiro .
ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 (03) :439-450
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, LIVING STORM DAMAGE
[4]  
Ayanz J., 2015, MIN C PROT FOR EUR M
[5]   A novel comparative research platform designed to determine the functional significance of tree species diversity in European forests [J].
Baeten, Lander ;
Verheyen, Kris ;
Wirth, Christian ;
Bruelheide, Helge ;
Bussotti, Filippo ;
Finer, Leena ;
Jaroszewicz, Bogdan ;
Selvi, Federico ;
Valladaresh, Fernando ;
Allan, Eric ;
Ampoorter, Evy ;
Auge, Harald ;
Avacariei, Daniel ;
Barbaro, Luc ;
Barnoaiea, Ionu ;
Bastias, Cristina C. ;
Bauhus, Jurgen ;
Beinhoff, Carsten ;
Benavides, Raquel ;
Benneter, Adam ;
Berger, Sigrid ;
Berthold, Felix ;
Boberg, Johanna ;
Bonal, Damien ;
Braggernann, Wolfgang ;
Carnol, Monique ;
Castagneyrol, Bastien ;
Charbonnier, Yohan ;
Checko, Ewa ;
Coomess, David ;
Coppi, Andrea ;
Dalmaris, Eleftheria ;
Danila, Gabriel ;
Dawud, Seid M. ;
de Vries, Wim ;
De Wandeler, Hans ;
Deconchat, Marc ;
Domisch, Timo ;
Duduman, Gabriel ;
Fischer, Markus ;
Fotelli, Mariangela ;
Gessler, Arthur ;
Gimeno, Teresa E. ;
Granier, Andre ;
Grossiord, Charlotte ;
Guyot, Virginie ;
Hantsch, Lydia ;
Haettenschwiler, Stephan ;
Hector, Andy ;
Hermy, Martin .
PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2013, 15 (05) :281-291
[6]   Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change [J].
Brang, Peter ;
Spathelf, Peter ;
Larsen, J. Bo ;
Bauhus, Juergen ;
Boncina, Andrej ;
Chauvin, Christophe ;
Drossler, Lars ;
Garcia-Gueemes, Carlos ;
Heiri, Caroline ;
Kerr, Gary ;
Lexer, Manfred J. ;
Mason, Bill ;
Mohren, Frits ;
Muehlethaler, Urs ;
Nocentini, Susanna ;
Svoboda, Miroslav .
FORESTRY, 2014, 87 (04) :492-503
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? [J].
Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. ;
Jactel, Herve ;
Parrotta, John A. ;
Quine, Christopher P. ;
Sayer, Jeffrey .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (05) :925-951
[9]   Random forests for classification in ecology [J].
Cutler, D. Richard ;
Edwards, Thomas C., Jr. ;
Beard, Karen H. ;
Cutler, Adele ;
Hess, Kyle T. .
ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (11) :2783-2792
[10]   The spread amongst ENSEMBLES regional scenarios: regional climate models, driving general circulation models and interannual variability [J].
Deque, M. ;
Somot, S. ;
Sanchez-Gomez, E. ;
Goodess, C. M. ;
Jacob, D. ;
Lenderink, G. ;
Christensen, O. B. .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 38 (5-6) :951-964