A 9-YEAR ANALYSIS OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL TRENDS FOR JOURNALS IN THE SUBJECT CATEGORY OF GENERAL AND INTERNAL MEDICINE

被引:7
作者
Foo, Jong Yong Abdiel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Div Res, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Biomed Engn Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE | 2009年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
bibliographical database; citation; impact factor; indexing; IMPACT FACTOR; CITATION ANALYSIS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/08989620902984080
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
For academic research outcomes, an important bibliometric scoring termed as the journal impact factor (JIF) is used when assessment of the quality of research is required. No known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of 'Medicine, General & Internal' journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports. Data from the Journal Citation Reports and Web of Science database were extracted to formulate a comprehensive analysis. In this study, the trends of 15 journals (5 top ranked and 10 low ranked; 5 English and 5 non-English based) were selected and analysed over a 9-year period (starting from year 1999 to 2007). Using the year 1999 as the base year, the results showed that the JIF rose significantly for the selected top ranked journals (up to 180.9%) while the low ranked ones slipped in their JIF value (down to -44.4%). The observed upward or downward trend was caused by a combination of other bibliographical measures like citations, number of citable, and total items published. It is postulated that changes in bibliographical trends can be classified as editorial and non-editorial influences. The impacts of these influences on the 15 selected journals over the 9-year period were also discussed retrospectively.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 152
页数:26
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The counting house [J].
Adam, D .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6873) :726-729
[2]   Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals [J].
Callaham, M ;
Wears, RL ;
Weber, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2847-2850
[3]   Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000-2004 [J].
Fan, Jennifer C. ;
McGhee, Charles N. J. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 36 (01) :54-61
[4]   How citation analysis can monitor the progress of research in clinical medicine [J].
Fava, GA ;
Guidi, J ;
Sonino, N .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2004, 73 (06) :331-333
[5]   CITATION INDEXES FOR SCIENCE - NEW DIMENSION IN DOCUMENTATION THROUGH ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS [J].
GARFIELD, E .
SCIENCE, 1955, 122 (3159) :108-111
[6]   The history and meaning of the journal impact factor [J].
Garfield, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01) :90-93
[7]   Should we ditch impact factors? No [J].
Hobbs, Richard .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7593) :569-569
[8]  
*I SCI 2NF, J CIT REP
[9]   Current concepts review - Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor [J].
Kurmis, AP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12) :2449-2454
[10]   Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact [J].
Lawrence, S .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6837) :521-521